Modi Vs Rahul Contest 2014

Dec 21 • Opinion • 4164 Views • 32 Comments on Modi Vs Rahul Contest 2014


Following his victory in the Gujarat assembly elections, the rising tide of support among BJP cadres for Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi to be nominated the party’s Prime Ministerial candidate could be hard to quell as the next Lok Sabha election approaches introduces trends of Indian Politics.

But Modi’s victory, just short of his 2007 triumph, carries a note of caution: there is still much work left to be done. Meanwhile, the RSS will – however reluctantly – back the man who could conceivably return the NDA to power after a decade. The Nagpur-based swayamsevaks may have some 19th century social ideas but they have a pragmatic political streak.



Modi spent six years in Delhi under L.K. Advani’s tutelage learning to be the team player – first, as the BJP’s National Secretary (with five states under his leadership) and then, in 1998, as the party’s General Secretary (Organization). Much of this national tenure was during Vajpayee’s NDA government. In 1998, Advani put Modi in charge of directing future Gujarat election campaigns in – ironically – Himachal Pradesh and Gujarat. Modi also organised L.K. Advani’s Rath Yatra from Somnath to Ayodhya and a march from Kanyakumari to Kashmir.

The same man who behaves like a “dictator” in Gujarat appears flexible enough – and presumably sensible enough – to behave differently when leading a national coalition than a state. A group of senior leaders like Sushma Swaraj, Arun Jaitley, Yashwant Sinha and others will however have to work closely and professionally together to outline the party’s policies on economic reforms, Pakistan, China, internal security and social development.

(Click  Rahul vs Modi 2014 to listen the audio).

The 2002 riots took place four months after Modi was asked to go to Gujarat as Chief Minister by the BJP’s national leadership following Keshubhai Patel’s resignation in October 2001. Several Hindu-Muslim riots had occurred under previous BJP governments and – most virulently and frequently – during the near-30 years of Congress rule.

It took Modi three days to end the 2002 carnage in which over 1,000 people died, three-quarters of them Muslims. He must express regret at what happened on his watch. That does not mean accepting the charge of complicity. But expressing regret is necessary – not because it may or may not double the percentage of Muslims who voted for him in the 2012 assembly election (22%) but because it is the honourable thing to do.

Modi rightly says he works for six crore Gujaratis – not Muslims, Hindus, Christians, Sikhs or Parsis. It is the Congress that seeks to divide communities by segregating them into silos for special treatment. That is not secularism but communalism dressed up as secularism.

* * *

Now to Rahul. Dynasty stunts a political party. Dynastic parties like the DMK,NCP,NC,Shiv Sena and SAD are bereft of the genuinely talented leaders. Once the patriarch is gone, the rest atrophy. Merit rises and then bumps its head up against a mezzanine ceiling. Everyone rises to the level of the family heir’s incompetence.

As Prof Ashutosh Varshney of Columbia University wrote in an article earlier this week, dynasty is inherently in the undemocratic and antithetical to good governance. He held – again rightly – Indira Gandhi responsible for the anti-democratic example she set with her policies.

Rahul is an unfortunate victim of this quagmire. By default, he might have to face Modi in the next general election. After a voter-friendly Budget topped up by cash transfers, the monsoon session could be the last of this parliament which may be prorogued in September 2013 following uncertainty over the SP’s outside support and Mayawati’s self-serving strategy. Elections could then be held in December 2013, four months ahead of the regular schedule.

Rahul knows Dr. Manmohan Singh, at 81-plus, will not be a contender for the Prime Ministership in 2013-14. Mr. P. Chidambaram has two Supreme Court cases coming up soon – a petition challenging his 2009 Lok Sabha election from Sivaganga by a wafer-thin majority and the Aircel-Maxis controversy. He would be a soft target for the opposition.

Sonia’s ill-health may rule her out. So Rahul it will have to be. But the Congress, stunted intellectually by its dynastic mezzanine ceiling, would prefer to protect him from defeat and preserve him for another day, another fight.

Can it? This is the dilemma the Congress will have to resolve in the next few months. But what if it does indeed boil down to a Modi-Rahul contest in 2014?

You may also like to visit:

You are welcomed to express your views through comment section

Submit Coaching Center Details Free

If you want to advertise call: 08130802212

Institution Name (required)
Address (required)
Contact Person (required)
Email (required)
Contact Number (required)
Additional Details(Courses/Subjects)
Fill the answer

Related Posts

32 Responses to Modi Vs Rahul Contest 2014

  1. As per me in 2014 modi will be more profitable then to rahul.The modi has promoted himself not as a party leader but a leader of mass or an development idol where as rahul hadn’t proven himself till now now indian are more conscious than ever before in the name of development. They are not thinking for religion but for country Congress had launched rahul as a star which could shine but modi resembles himself as ground person.

  2. I think Modi is a good leader and has done development in Gujarat far more than Rahul. He has raised Gujarat in last two elections and has been opted again as C.M. by the people of Gujarat as he is developing the state. People are happy with his work and so made him their representative again. He must be given chance in 2014 so that he can govern our country and make it more better as he has done in Gujarat. He serve the people not the caste. He serve without thinking of community and caste and work just for development. While Rahul has not proved as a good leader. Congress has never done development at that level. I think Modi must be given chance in 2014.

  3. Modi is a good leader as compared to rahul because he has changed the economical condition of gujrat.
    He is a powerful,strong leader,and a good communicator too which makes him a good CM.
    he has increased the economical,industrial,other kind of progress reports of the gujrat.
    he increased the industrialisation in gujrat.that’s why people make him CM third time.
    but rahul is not such a powerful leader,yes he represents youth but by eating food with the poor people once in a year,doesn’t make him a good leader.

  4. roshani mishra says:

    I guess modi will prove himself better than modi must get the chance1!!

  5. Ramesh Verma says:

    modi must be the next PM

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

« »

Read previous post:
The Media Effect or Media trial

The Media Effect or Media trial Hello everyone...It is impossible to look at 26/11 and not discuss the role of...