Rau IAS study circle UPSC 2018 result

Apr 28 • General • 835 Views • No Comments on Rau IAS study circle UPSC 2018 result

Rau IAS study circle

3.3

Past Year Result

1.5/10

Infrastructure

6.0/10

Batch Size

5.0/10

Teahers

2.0/10

fee

2.0/10

Pros

  • good infrastrucure
  • Well informative
  • Nice counselling

Cons

  • Poor result
  • Over advertising
  • Irregularity in teaching
  • Notes quality not very good

Rau IAS study circle which claims it self to be best IAS coaching in Delhi , Bangalore and Jaipur has not released its number of aspirants clearing in UPSC civil services.

UPtil now we have inspected top 6 Candidates of 2018 and none of them have attributed their success to Rau IAS Study Circle.

Advertisement of Rau IAS in Indian express did not mention of any selection this year , ratther poster still carries last year Ranks.

Even http://www.rauias.com/ is silent on this. We can still see image of Tina Dabi as memory of old students.

Its a serious matter as standard of teaching has gone down and although Vajiram & Ravi has also claimed to teach rank 1 through its advertisement in The Hundu today but an interview at The hinduy portal says that topper did not take coaching from any coaching.

Moreover its matter of basic understanding that topper is a Revenue officer with government of India and would not have flown everyday to take classes at Vajiram and then again return back to reach office next day at time.

Similarly We are waiting for claims from Rau IAS about toppers and if not then Rau IAS study circle should think on its strategy of teaching students.

Students are waiting for performance of different coachings as many students who have to appear for UPSC civil services in 2019 are looking for coachings and they are in final phase of search for best coaching.

At this time if Rau IAS study circle result would have been apt they would have come with advertisement in news paper for which we will again wait tomorrow

Tell us Your Queries, Suggestions and Feedback

Your email address will not be published.

« »