Should we have Age Limit or Retirement for Politicians?

Dec 15 • Group Discussion, Opinion • 13076 Views • 270 Comments on Should we have Age Limit or Retirement for Politicians?

Should we have Age Limit or Retirement for Politicians?

According to my point of view there should be an age limit. In our country every field have some retirement age, but in politics no such age limit is there. Generally it has been seen that at the age of 55-60 a person becomes lazy and many health problems engulfs.At that span of time he loses his capability to think more effectively. As we know politicians are very crucial and important part of our country. So politicians should have retirement age.

politicians should have a retirement age

Old is gold,is this true for politics so far?

I feel it is good to give youth more opportunities because they are full of ideas and are energetic to their tasks. Youth are full of passion and they have capability to work with zeal and confidence. They are fresh minded and can take right decision. The decision taken by young person is dynamic. If there willbe age limit then young generation will get chance to prove themselves. Now a day’s more than 90 % of Indian politicians are above 60. Just because there is no age limit, a politician continues to do his job until he is alive. I know they have experience but after a certain age limit they are not able to work so effectively which automatically lowers the development of our country. Due to lack of job opportunities many youngsters are going to foreign countries for higher education or in seek of good job. Youth should be given opportunity in politics. If there will be age limit of 60 years for politicians and they won’t be allowed to work beyond this age many of the young people will get chance to work and do some good steps to improve our nation . So that there may be chance of change in corrupted politics and make our country corruption free and developed. Politicians would need to retire notonly because they are physically unable to cope with the rigors of this demanding career, but because they feel that they have done a bit for the country. So I suggest that the age limit should be restricted up to age of 60.

you may also like

Criminalisation of politics

Backwardness consequence of our Political System

Readers are requeste to post their valuable comments below.

Tell us Your Queries, Suggestions and Feedback

Your email address will not be published.

270 Responses to Should we have Age Limit or Retirement for Politicians?

  1. Anonymous says:
  2. SHRUTI PRIYA says:

    I think POLITICS is a game which demands experienced players.One’s mind get sharper with the time.In short POLITICS (DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT OF INDIA) is not about one man’s army,it works with the cabinet of ministers. So we need the involvement of all age groups.

  3. Jayanta Das says:

    According to me there should be a age limit for the politicians as we talk about the entry and retirement. You know what the youth have the better skills to grow up the country. So there should a law that youth also apply to go in the politics. Because they have better management skills, better knowledge, they have the power to take the unique decisions because their minds is working like that only.
    As limiting on politicians age will give them time to take a break from the endless job they have done throughout their life, it will also give chance to young blood to prove there metal.
    Country like United States Of America too have an age limit for their President, then why should not country like India do that.
    No doubt that a person would have gained a lot of experience but it should also stands to reason that Youth is a symbol for strength and Innovation. The youngsters are asking for their stand in politics from a very large period of time and now the time has come to fulfill their wish.

  4. Nandita Pradhan says:

    The way each and every worker has an age limit in their respective fields, in that same way politicians should have age limit for their work. Politicians are also the part of the government so they should also have the age limit.
    A man has an good working ability when he is in his younger age . As age increases a man losses his ability to carry out jobs in the way they used to do before.Human being suffers from different problems as soon as they grow up. Its true that old politicians teach us ample about the facts that they are aware with and also helps us to have guidelines. But due to their retiring age and their problems they are not able to implement their ideas in that fruitful way. So by keeping them as our guide beside our side we should walk forward with our young generations in order to come out with fruitful outputs beneficial for politics.

  5. Rajan Tiwari says:

    In a country where the principal of a college is retired at 65, because he/she is considered old to run the college and manage the administrative work. The same country allows a person to run the nation at 80! This is really not justified.

    thanx 4 read this comment.

  6. Mayank says:

    According to me the age limit must be there, A politician cant work till his/her death. Politician must have the age limit above 40 and below 65.Science had proved that after some age limit the human thinking gets low he/she cant have the same memory power as had earlier and also proved that the people have a best working and sharp mind in its age limit and it also does not depend on the work experience.If there is no age limit then young people will never get chance to join politics and work for our country.The same trend will be continued for ever.so their must be something so that the young people who are moving to other nation for the seek of job and to pursue higher degree can join politics. our country needs more and more talent so that the country will rise !!!!!!

  7. Vipul Bhashkar says:

    Why do we have retirement age as 60yrs for a Central Govt.employee….
    It is an Unofficial Intimation to him by Govt. that

    “BEYOND THIS AGE YOUR MIND WILL LOSE THE REQUIRED THINKING POWER TO PERFORM YOUR DUTIES..”

    If a clerk working at his office cant perform his duties properly beyond this age, How come a politician who has to take care of a whole constituency or a whole state perform his duty efficiently..

    But our political system is TO BE BLAMED,I say Our’s is a Democratic Monarchy of two Big Parties…A person who joins one of these parties at a young age of 20-25 will become a leader after 30-35 yrs making his age close to 60 or 70… If he chooses to compete as an Independent he’s not going to win as many of the voters are inclined towards the money distributed by others.

  8. Keshav Bhagat says:

    Yes ‘I totally agree that, a politician has to have a retirement age, because politicians are very crucial and imperative towards the country. Generally after the age of 50 a person becomes lazy, inculcates many health problems and as they loose there capability to think more effectively and work more positively. And I thing that it is good to give youths more opportunities than giving an aged person because youths are full of ideas and are energetic in their task….

    Secondly we have old, I do not go for the statement that old is gold because the gold is gold only and cannot be compared to any age group, the work should be gold whether it is accomplished by young or old. But the thing is there, the old are having an immense experience of life, decision, work, they will surely think ten times to take any work to be done out in a positive aspect as they might have had gone through it earlier.

    conclusion:
    So my conlusion is that politicians should have retirement age of nearly 60 -65yrs of age!

  9. Vikash Yadav says:

    When there is a concept of retirement for many other careers like engineers, bankers, CEOs, etc. why shouldn’t the same apply for politicians?

    If the reason for a retirement age in the private sectors is that the capacity to contribute becomes lesser, the same applies for politics. If the reason is that they should have a relaxed retirement life, the same applies for politics.

    If the old people retire, it will give a chance for younger people with fresher perspectives to come in (with the hope that ‘remote control’ possibilities will be minimal), and at the same time the bureaucracy gets refreshed more often with lesser influence by the older people.

    Of course, I know it’ll never happen, because the law would have to be passed by the very same people whose careers will be shorte

  10. Sanchari Bhattacharya says:

    The Normal Central or State government employee has the age limit of 60 years. The Supreme court judge has the retirement age limit set to 65 years. Then why should politicians be allowed to work beyond certain age. why is there no provision that asks them to retire at a certain age from politics. lets list some politicians Atal bhari vajapayee, L K Advani, Manmohan singh, Devegowda, Jyoti basu, Tamilnadu CM, and the list goes on. you can also add as many as you guys remember let see how many of them are above 75 and still in politics. Additional Details first of all i am not afraid to mention any body’s name here its just that i did not remember there name at that point one person said that why i should spare sonia gandhi well i am not its for all the politicians who are above say 65 years. i feel its logically not appropriate to say that politicians work better with no corruption at the old age i think this is insane My simple question is if every one else in INDIA has a retirement age then why is it that a politician does not have this compulsion make a rule which is common for all individual. Why can there be a law which says that the politicians have to take retirement. i also wanna ask all of them out there who are in support of no age limit for politicians when is the younger generation gonna get the chance in politics if you wanna argue it this way that we have gotta make our own way i would say how long is it gonna take you to be a true politicians and will the old aged people consider your views will they allow you to blossom with flying colors now here some of you might argue that Rahul gandhi is the newbie in politics and show me some more name but these are the relatives of some old politicians who are either dead or are so disabled that they feel the need of younger blood in there party and ya some one said with old age comes wisdom then why did that fight happened in the parliament some two years back. Some here spoke about APJ Abul Kalam i admire this man but he is not a politician to become a president in INDIA you need not be a politician you do not have any controls in the internal affairs of the country. There is some thing more to add over here and that is even politicians get monthly salaries till the time they die even if they serve the country just for a year. i.e. who ever is elected once get the salary for the rest of his/her life. which make them the government employees right. i know some of you might have an objection to that as well. In US the president cannot contest the election again once he/she becomes the president and the president can be on chair only for 8 years max.

  11. Ritu Gupta says:

    Like everyone else, our politicians are elected to do a job. They ought to be subject to the same restraints placed on other employees. Age limits exist for a reason: to encourage the ascension of new talent, eliminate the potential for entrenched privilege, and ensure that the leadership reflects the changing times. All excellent reasons why it’s time to impose a retirement age for our political graybeards. Let them be governors, advisers, even presidents, hold ceremonial offices as reward for their long service. But the hard work of governing is best left to the relatively young. Old politicians don`t retire. They just snooze on the job. And wake up during an election year. How can leaders who make news only for their age-related ailments steer the country towards progress? Can they ever talk to or make sense of the restless, aspiration new generation? And if there is a lower age limit to contest polls, why shouldn’t there be an upper age limit?

  12. Divya Acharya says:

    yes,there must be an age limit for politicians so that our country should be ruled by correct and appropriate person.

  13. Niraj Singh says:

    hi friends…
    for
    Old politicians don`t retire. They just snooze on the job. And wake up during an election year. How can leaders who make news only for their age-related ailments steer the country towards progress? Can they ever talk to or make sense of the restless, aspirational new generation? And if there is a lower age limit to contest polls, why shouldn`t there be an upper age limit?
    against

    It`s fashionable to blame our aged netas for all our problems: From high oil prices to terror attacks to all that garbage on the streets. But it`s time we stopped eulogising the young and the inexperienced and give the old their due. For, age is just a number with all the advances we have made in medicine and any country needs experienced leaders.

  14. Vivek Singh says:

    If there is defined retirement age for IAS and IPS officers, Judges of Courts, Defense personnel, Bank Officers and all other Government workers then why not of politician ? They are also servants of Govt. Of India and there should be a fixed retirement age for them. Why is there all liberty provided to them ? Is there any doubt that young generation of India can’t handle the situation and react appropriately ? In fact the probability of quick and correct decision (which is basic leadership quality) by a young man is more than that by an old age person. Why is the age limit for any job opening? Reason is every one know that a person can work at his/her best at young age when he/she is not struggling from any mental or physical problem.

    As per my point of view this rule is also created by old days politicians who intentionally didn’t specify any age limit, because no one wants to hit axe on their own leg.

  15. Pallavi Jha says:

    White hair and wrinkles, not only portray old age but also a lifetime of experiences and challenges. India’s present statistics show that over 65% of the Indian population has people below the age of 35. this implies that a huge amount of youngsters constitute the population whereas the remaining ones are the so called “oldies”.so the youngsters already have ample opportunity don’t they? Imagine, how it would be without our old men. who would teach us about their past experiences? about how they dealt with different situations? how the whole system works? Learning is important. and a teacher can teach only if he is experienced and act as a visionary with patience and hold of the situation of course. so rather can cussing the fact than cussing the fact that our politicians are old and ranting about no age limits acknowledge the fact that Bapu, chacha Nehru were 78 and 74 respectively when they died and were still involved in politics. you can read in any book, or website what they achieved though they were old politicians 🙂

  16. Sumit Manna says:

    I personally believe that there should be a retirement age. It not only give youngsters a chance to prove themselves but also it gives new directions of thinking and taking decisions. It is right that aged people are more experienced but a chance should be given to new brains also to make a right decision & to get an experience. Also the new generation is full of ideas & innovations. Not only this but aged people are not able to give their 100% because they are themselves weak & having health problems. So there should be a retirement age.

  17. Suprakash Chakraborty says:

    I think there should be a retirement age of the politicians but not totally from the politics just from the active politics. They must be made part of the recommendation committe. After this we can use the radical thoughts of the young politicians as well as the experience of the older politicians. Hence we can give ourselves a better chance of improving the overall scenario of the country.

  18. Niraj Singh says:

    hello friend’s..
    according to my point of view
    Politicians must have minimum educational background, min age for entry to politics with adequete work experience of solving grass root problems. Finally, they must have a retierement age – which may be hiegher than Govt servants. After certain age their expierence may be utilised for advisory role rather than active politics.
    against:-I am going against this because, I have seen a person like Abdul kalam who is still rendering his services even now at such age, we need people like him and all the experience which he has in the world so that he can mentor many more like him, when someone is really good at something and still has the energy to put in some more years why are we forcing them to retire…We need all their experience as youngsters in India are a bit impatient till what we have seen, and we do not have many youngsters who can handle the job of politician, it can be dealt by a person who has experience in getting things done. And youngsters we do not find that capability in them. The social networking politicians are finding the wrath from all the corners lately. As still they don’t the basic essence of Indian politics…So if a politician is good at his job let him continue there should be no problem at all.

  19. sarmistha says:

    According to my point of view there should be an age limit. In our country every field have some retirement age, but in politics no such age limit is there.In the age of 60-65 at that span of time he loses his capability to think more effectively. As we know politicians are very crucial and important part of our country. So politicians should have retirement age. because the politicians are the leaders who take decision and they are the pathfinders of our country.s o they must be fit in all respects.politicians are very crucial and important part of our country. So politicians should have retirement age. I feel it is good to give youth more opportunities because they are full of ideas and are energetic to their tasks. Youth are full of passion and they have capability to work with zeal and confidence. They are fresh minded and can take right decision. The decision taken by young person is dynamic. Ifthere willbe age limit then young generation will get chance to prove themselves. Now a day’s more than 90 % of Indian politicians are above 60. Just because there is no age limit, a politician continues to do his job until he is alive. I know they have experience but after a certain age limit they are not able to work so effectively which automatically lowers the development of our country. Due to lack of job opportunities many youngsters are going to foreign countries for higher education or in seek of good job. Youth should be given opportunity in politics.If there will be age limit of 60 years for politicians and they won’t be allowed to work beyond this age many of the young people will get chance to work and do some good steps to improve our nation . So that there may be chance of change in corrupted politics and make our country corruption free and developed.
    although the old people will be having good experience but they should give chance to the next generation and can remain sidewise to give certain advises or can give the instructions.and it is also seen that in the age of 60 s they are having small health problems and cannot take pressures to such extent.so they should give chance to the young generation.

  20. abhijeet basak says:

    a good politician learn from his experience.more is experience of a politician and more is dedication towards works than more will be output .young have more energy and dedication then old . experience with young energy give better result.so political should be given chance up to they use their experience with young for country and after that they have to be retired.so there should not be any age limit only their work output decide their retirement

  21. Rajan Ranjan Prasad says:

    hello friends…….
    If there is defined retirement age for IAS and IPS officers, Judges of Courts, Defense personnel, Bank Officers and all other Government workers then why not of politician ? They are also servants of Govt. Of India and there should be a fixed retirement age for them. Why is there all liberty provided to them ? Is there any doubt that young generation of India can’t handle the situation and react appropriately ? In fact the probability of quick and correct decision (which is basic leadership quality) by a young man is more than that by an old age person. Why is the age limit for any job opening? Reason is every one know that a person can work at his/her best at young age when he/she is not struggling from any mental or physical problem.

    As per my point of view this rule is also created by old days politicians who intentionally didn’t specify any age limit, because no one wants to hit axe on their own leg.

  22. Prashant jain says:

    Yes, there should be an age limit for politicians in politics, as it also proved by the doctors that after the age of 65-70 years our brain doesn’t work sharply as in young age. As well as we are having age limit in our Government jobs and in judiciary system, than why not we should have age limit in politics. We always tell that we are having the most powerful young brigade in this world, than why we should not have the right to join politics as the time is right to join politics and eliminate the corruption from it. We thought the young brigade do not have enough knowledge for joining politics, so the old and experience politics should join hands with us, and tell us the right and wrong of politics and slowly give the power in our hand, so we can use it in right way.

  23. Saurabh Jajoo says:

    age doesn’t metters for any one. according to me the politicians are the main parts of our country. if any age
    limit is there then how there experience will be useful for us. if we will take the example of mr atal bihari vajpayi and mr narendra modi they gave and giving there best in the age of 70s. so there retierment should be based on there workability not on there age. and if we want young generation to work in politics then the aged politicians should be there to direct them.

  24. Kaush Agarwal says:

    According to my point of view retirement is necessary for politicians. It not only give youngsters a chance to prove themselves but also it gives new directions of thinking and taking decisions. It is right that aged people are more experienced but a chance should be given to new brains also to make a right decision & to get an experience. Also the new generation is full of ideas & innovations. Not only this but aged people are not able to give their 100% because they are themselves weak & having health problems. So there should be a retirement age.

  25. Sakshi Jaiswal says:

    Ya of course there must be a age limit for the retirement of politicians.
    There can be various reasons , firstly the more young generation people will there ,the more will be new innovative ideas for the development of the country. Secondly according to the age many a politicians sitting on their seat just want a personal profit in the sake of the development of country.
    Also the young generation people have their own strategy with a mixing of their new and old ideas of past politicians. Also young people look towards high education which make them feel what will be the beneficial things for the country’s bright future. if the age limit will not be restricted the country’s situation will be same as it is in present. mostly politicians of our country is in the age in which they must be retired 60+ through which we can conclude what is right or what is wrong.
    So i highly opinionised there must be retired age n welcome to young politicians as they are more hardworking n efficient with the new concepts and strategies.

  26. ankita singh says:

    according to my opinion the age limit for politicians is not neccesary because the polititians are not doing any physical work .they require lots of experiance which comes from age.as the age is increases experiance is also increases.therefore age lilmit is not neccesary as we have the great example or our prime minister manmohan singh which have lots of experiance and run our country very well.

  27. Achal Rathore says:

    yes its right ,becuse age limit is compulsory for politicians because younger politician should get a chance ,because Younger have new thought and Educated so they are give new direction to Country. the age range is 60 years for retirement is enough and after the retirement of aged politicians should be make as an adviser of younger politicians.hence the aged politicians get respect .he won’t feel unrespected……….!

  28. Vikas Chaubey says:

    Like everyone else, our politicians are elected to do a job. They ought to be subject to the same restraints placed on other employees. Age limits exist for a reason: to encourage the ascension of new talent, eliminate the potential for entrenched privilege, and ensure that the leadership reflects the changing times. All excellent reasons why it’s time to impose a retirement age for our political graybeards. Let them be governors, advisers, even presidents, hold ceremonial offices as reward for their long service. But the hard work of governing is best left to the relatively young. Old politicians don`t retire. They just snooze on the job. And wake up during an election year. How can leaders who make news only for their age-related ailments steer the country towards progress? Can they ever talk to or make sense of the restless, aspiration new generation? And if there is a lower age limit to contest polls, why shouldn’t there be an upper age limit? thnak you

  29. Varun Tiwari says:

    i think there should be an retiring age for the politician because when the person become old then he cannot do a piece of work with full energy and dedication as compare to the young person …and in each department whether it is government our private there is a retiring age of 60 .. because after this age the person is incapable of doing the work with full boost and energy… if there is a retiring age in every department then why not in politics..!!

  30. Vishal Rai says:

    As lots of people have lot of example that there should be a age limit same here I have also an example like Sachin Tendulkar retired as he is not feeling comfortable with the physical fitness and he takes decision to take retirement. As there is scalability to compare there ability.
    Many of the people influence with their famous personality and do not want to make changes in the loved ones whether they are not capable to do such things.
    So the conclusion is that there should be a age limit according to the case study of these things to improvise the acceptability.

  31. mohit mittal says:

    According to me it should be necessary to time limit for politicians . Young blood has to be come. Youth is intelligent and aware about country’s problems but to solve those problems experience of seniors is necessary. after 60 they are not as much efficient to work. So they should be retire.

  32. ankita maheshwari says:

    According to my point of view there should be an age limit.Though it is is considerable to have experienced people in parliament to provide guidance & foresee the consequences of any act but it is of equal importance to provide young minds equal opportunity to come up with their innovative ideas for rapid development of any nation. The age should not be the criteria the persons qualification and his presence of mind, experience should be the criteria.For the growth of the country new youth should step forward to look after the nation.

  33. richa jain says:

    my point of view we are living in modern age .and age limit for politicians.In government job many of those person working in age of 60-70. they should be retire from their job.many of young person who have not job.they seek for job.as many student are educated they have quality for devlpoment in india.
    As limiting on politicians age will give them time to take a break from the endless job they have done throughout their life, it will also give chance to young blood to prove there metal.
    In india their is unemployment problem increase day by day.
    Country like United States Of America too have an age limit for their President, then why should not country like India do that.in india for president election should be fellow education policy…..
    and like America young person should be become a president.and also follow the rule of age limit.

  34. neeraj dubey says:

    I am of the view that there should be age limit for politicians as the young people has more innovative ideas. In our country every field have some retirement age, but in politics no such age limit is there. Generally it has been seen that at the age of 55-60 a person becomes lazy and many health problems . At that span of time he loses his capability to think more effectively. As we know politicians are very crucial and important part of our country. So politicians should have retirement age. I feel it is good to give youth more opportunities because they are full of ideas and are energetic

  35. Ankur Gupta says:

    yes there should be age limit for politicians as the young people has more innovative and they should be given the chance to come in politics .young people are the future of the country and they can give more develope the country . and lead the country in a better way .young people can do more hard work
    than the retirement people so there should be the retirement in politics

  36. RAJEEV SHRIVASTAVA says:

    from my point of view age limit for politicians. A person who does not fit or say cannot solve the arising problems should not be allowed to come into politics ,it does not matter how young he is.
    new ideas are also important so according to me after a certain age politicians should take retierment and then guide the new ones to work in better direction.thinking of old age leaders is according to their generation but this time is of modern technology

  37. ankesh jain says:

    It is well said “THERE IS BIG DIFFERENCE IN THINKING AND IMPLEMENTING “. One can think a lot but at a time of implementation he will realise how difficult it is.

    In a same way we people think that Politicians are not able to govern country properly as many of them are too old. But in reality governing a country is as toughf task as riding a bicycle first time. Its easy to take decision for ourself but taking a decision from country point of view is not at all a easy task.

    Think of a sitatution, 30 year old person is a Defence Minister and he get to know that Terrorist had hijaked an Aircraft in which 200 passangers are there and terrorist demanded of realising 5 other terrorist. Arm force is ready to attack but probability of saving all the passangers is less. At a same time he see 1000 of people of other Political party standing outside his office protesting against him. At this point of time what you think who will take better decision a 30 year old new MInister or a well experence 60 or above aged person.

    Overning a country is not at all a easy task and one can govern as better as much he is experence.

  38. ARCHITA GUPTA says:

    the age limit is use full in the politics because the younger have no chance to represent there ideas and itself. because the younger have new creative ideas in there mind and the education factor is also include in the politics . the age is must be 60 years and after that the retirement . age factor is different different for the the post in politics so in the politics there are some young person and some experience person is worked together so the working is good for the people.

  39. Kaustubh Joshi says:

    Yes, there should be an age limit for politicians in politics, as it also proved by the doctors that after the age of 65-70 years our brain doesn’t work sharply as in young age. As well as we are having age limit in our Government jobs and in judiciary system, than why not we should have age limit in politics. We always tell that we are having the most powerful young brigade in this world, than why we should not have the right to join politics as the time is right to join politics and eliminate the corruption from it. We thought the young brigade do not have enough knowledge for joining politics, so the old and experience politics should join hands with us, and tell us the right and wrong of politics and slowly give the power in our hand, so we can use it in right way.

  40. Harshit Singh says:

    Yes, there should be a age limit for politicians in politics, as it also proved by the doctors that after the age of 65-70 years our brain doesn’t work sharply as in young age. As well as we are having age limit in our Government jobs and in judiciary system, than why not we should have age limit in politics. We always tell that we are having the most powerful young brigade in this world, than why we should not have the right to join politics , as the time is right to join politics and eliminate the corruption from it. We thought the young brigade do not have enough knowledge for joining politics, so the old and experience politics should join hands with us , and tell us the right and wrong of politics and slowly give the power in our hands , so we can use it in right way.

  41. Neeraj Rathore says:

    I fully support this idea of having age limit in politics. we have to be as modern to consider the fact that a young person can also handle the politics. there should be an age limit for retirement of politicians so that young generation get a chance.I think age should be 70 so that there will be a balance in the parliament. As if youth will be as leader,then there will be safe responsibility on them and they can move towards new ideas. They themselves can work very fast and effectively. In this modern technology, we need a new ideas having leader.

  42. Rachit Agarwal says:

    according to my side there should be an age limit and retirement should be there.In our country we will see that one politician whole life will be spend in politic and the other one can get the chance to do something for our country so age limit should be there.So politicians should have retirement age.The retirement age should 50-55% I think so.So, the leaders who have crossed a certain age limit because other new generation age can get the chance.The new generation get known the old person well……

  43. amit tomar says:

    I my opinion diversity should be maintained as youth is hot blooded and older persons are cold blooded but bloods are equally important for the progress of country. Youth are full of ideas and are energetic, active, can work in hectic environmental condition but lacks in experience. And just opposite in older politicians the are lethargic, less active and cannot work in hectic environment but they have vast knowledge which cost too much to our country. Actually politicians work in very responsible task and we have to represent our country in world. So using activeness ideas as well as experience can improve the conditions of country and helpful to citizens as well as our country.

    Say for example budget preparation is an important task and youth alone cannot prepare well it needs experience as well as future thoughts which is possessed by older politicians. So I want to say that there should age for retirement of older politicians only from active politics not from politics completely.

    They should be in committees and advisory council to guide youth to be a better politician and help youth to excel in there work.

  44. nitin gupta says:

    i think there can not be any kind of age limit for the retirement of the politicians because on increasing age experience also increases so aged politicians can lead the country well and aged people done excellent work for the growth of the nation instead of their ages wisdom also increases with the ages and critical decisions can be only taken through deep thinking and our past experience so there can not be any age limit

  45. ujjwal23 says:

    In a country where the principal of a college is retired at 65, because he/she is considered old to run the college and manage the administrative work. The same country allows a person to run the nation at 80! This is really not justified.

  46. Anil Kumar Shakya says:

    According to my mind i don’t think there is age limit .Because there is no age for social work .
    The older person has more experiences in comparison. so i don’t think that should be age limit in politics.
    The age limit does not matter if the person who has authority, knows and understands the responsibility of his then he should work

  47. AKSHAT VERMA says:

    No, i do not think so that there should be a age limit for politicians as we know that leading a country requires experience that a older witty person has.At young age we are physically fit so we can provide our services to some more physical task.We can take the example of Narendra Modi he is leading Gujrat efficiently at an age of 62(approx) so i think we need a person having a experience.

  48. Naina Pandey says:

    yes i think that politician should have age limit since in every field their is age limit and so the same should be for politician
    As at certain age the ability to think new idea decrease therefore if the politician are not aged than they can think different and innovative idea for the better meant of country economy
    but since in India there is no age limit for politician in India therefore it affect the country welfare as the age of individual increase then the person become lazy and ill.
    since everything needs to refreshed from tym to tym and add new ideas to it so does our political system. so the leaders who have crossed a certain age limit should now make way for new ideas.
    Youth is full of new and innovative ideas which can be used for the betterment of the country so the new generation should be given chance for it. Young person which is full of energy,strong and fresh minded who can handle the entire nation,who can take smart decisions for remove corruption and other facing problems to growth or increase the level of our country.so required young leaders who can lead our nation.
    since the politicians have to take load of the whole country so it is very necessary that they should be capable of doing that.
    Aged politician only thing in fixed small criteria and for country development but since it is necessary to think in much and broad mind..
    youngsters can also get opportunities and they can develop country by giving their new initiative ideas for a country but they should be kept in different department like advisory board so that they can guide the young politician
    so we should have Age Limit or Retirement for Politicians .

  49. kuldeep mahor says:

    in my point of view the age limit is not necessary for the politician membership,because the older person have some experience and they have more imagination power to take a decision as compared to young people.this is mentioned in the experiment by the scientiest .
    in politician the experience as well as innovating power is very important for a developing country
    ,young people has a innovative idea but older person take more risky decision as compared to young people.Apart from this experience also matters as the person who has more experience can work better hence there occur no issue of age.
    Although experience is necessary to handle the country but that much experience can be achieved by the young person by hard work ,if hared work and experience both are necessary so older peoples are also applicable to do more things and more innovations for the country.

  50. Ankesh Sejwani says:

    Yes, because every generation has new ideas to resolive same problems in different or more appropriate method. and also it give equal chance to others also to show there leadershipskills.

  51. sapna soni says:

    Should we have Age Limit or Retirement for Politicians?
    YES, THERE SHOULD BE AGE LIMIT OF RETIREMENT FOR POLITICIANS AS THE PERSON AFTER CERTAIN AGE BECOMES OUT OF WORK AND COULD NOT GIVE HIS OR HER SERVICES UP TO THAT EXTENT.
    OF COURSE OLD BLOOD COULD NOT COMPETE WITH THE FRESH AND NEW BLOOD. AFTER THE AGE OF 55 OR 60 MAKES THE PERSON THINK OTHER WAY AND NOT ACTIVE IN HIS/HER WORK .
    HOWEVER, EDUCATED YOUTH OF TODAY’S WORLD KNOWS BETTER TECHNIQUES AND IDEAS WHICH IS VERY ESSENTIAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH OF THE COUNTRY. THEREFORE ,THERE SHOULD BE A SPECIFIC AGE LIMIT FOR IT.

  52. Mansi Khandelwal says:

    Yes, I think that politicians should have an age limit.
    Since, in every field there is an age limit so the same should be there for politicians. Because after a certain age the ability of thinking new ideas decreases. If the politicians are not of more then they can think for innovative and different ideas for the betterment of the country.
    But in India there is no certain age limit for politicians which in effect the country’s welfare. Because as the age of an individual increases then the person becomes lazy and ill. So, if a person himself is not well then how can he take the decision for the welfare of whole country.
    But it is also necessary for the politicians to be matured to take wise decisions.
    Since, everything needs to be refreshed from time to time, and add new ideas to it, so does our political system. So, the leaders who have crossed a certain age limit should now make way for the new generation leads to get in.
    Youth is full of new and innovative ideas which can be used for the betterment of the country.
    So, the new generation should be given chance for it.
    Since, the politicians have to take the load of whole country so it is very necessary that they should be capable of doing that.

  53. deepti wadhwani says:

    According to my point of view there should be an age limit. In our country every field have some retirement age, but in politics no such age limit is there. Generally it has been seen that at the age of 55-60 a person becomes lazy and many health problems engulfs. At that span of time he loses his capability to think more effectively. As we know politicians are very crucial and important part of our country. So politicians should have retirement age. I feel it is good to give youth more opportunities because they are full of ideas and are energetic to their tasks. Youth are full of passion and they have capability to work with zeal and confidence.

  54. EKTA GUPTA says:

    According to my point of view there should be age limitation for politicians because the young people has to provide some place , and they has more ideas for apply in India so that the system should be redeveloped so the Indian policies are changed………..

  55. Rahul Shivhare says:

    I fully agree with this idea of having age limit in politics.it is is considerable to have experienced people in parliament to provide guidance of any act, but it is of equal importance to provide young minds equal opportunity to come up with their innovative ideas for rapid development of any nation. Young candidates have energy & achieve something big for their nation which greatly contributes to upliftment of any nation. As they are young they could easily connect with any group of society and they would be aware of recent upcoming problems for which they could prepare themselves & prepare their action plan accordingly.there is another example it is is considerable to have experienced people in parliament to provide guidance & foresee the consequences of any act but it is of equal importance to provide young minds equal opportunity to come up with their innovative ideas for rapid development of any nation. Young candidates have energy & zeal to do & achieve something big for their nation which greatly contributes to upliftment of any nation. As they are young they could easily connect with any group of society and they would be aware of recent upcoming problems for which they could prepare themselves & prepare their action plan accordingly.

  56. Kanuska jain says:

    yaa i agree with the term… there should be an age limit in politics,,, politicians did not work till the end of his/her death.. the age limit should be between 30 to 40 because they understand what the youngsters want and what the older thinks…

    because the young people has so innovative and have new ideas and views and they know what is the today’s requirement and he also know that how to handle this becasue he have some experience so he can work better… so their be an age limit

  57. Monika Agrawal says:

    yes it is very necessary to age limit for politicians because in india , in every field have a age limit so why it is not in politics, and i think after age 60 , people become lazy ans not think effectively. it is very good to give youth oppourtunitie because they are full of ideas and are energetic to their task.. bt on other side in politics the experience is very necessary to rule the country so the agelimit should be upto 70.

  58. rohit Sharma says:

    In my opinion diversity should be maintained as youth is hot blooded and older persons are cold blooded but bloods are equally important for the progress of country. Youth are full of ideas and are energetic, active, can work in hectic environmental condition but lacks in experience. And just opposite in older politicians they are lethargic, less active and cannot work in hectic environment but they have vast knowledge which cost too much to our country. Actually politicians work in very responsible task and we have to represent our country in world. So using activeness ideas as well as experience can improve the conditions of country and helpful to citizens as well as our country.

    Say for example budget preparation is an important task and youth alone cannot prepare well it needs experience as well as future thoughts which is possessed by older politicians. So I want to say that there should age for retirement of older politicians only from active politics not from politics completely.

    They should be in committees and advisory council to guide youth to be a better politician and help youth to excel in there work.

  59. Dheeraj Kumar Yadav says:

    THERE SHOULD BE AGE LIMIT OF THE POLITICIAN INTO THE POLITICS, BECAUSE THERE ARE A LOT OF TALENT IN INDIA ARE WAITING IN THE LINE SO THE THERE SHOULD BE A AGE LIMIT OF THE POLITICIANE SO AFTER THERE RETIREMENT THE YOUNG TALENT SHOULD COME INTO THE POLITICS AND THEY GIVE THERE INNOVATIVE IDEA FOR THE DEVLOPEMENT OF THE COUNTRY SO THAT THE INDIANS CAN MAKE A GOOD IMAGE IN THIS WORLD.
    ACCORDING TO ME THE AGE LIMIT FOR THE POLITICIANE SHOULD BE 50 YEAR AFTER THE 50 YEAR THEY HAVE TO RETIRED AND ALL YOUNGERS COME TO IN THE POLITICS SO THAT WE HAVE A OPPORTUNITY FOR THE GROWING OF THE INDIA.

  60. sakshi sharma says:

    I personally feels age limit should be assigned to politicians..when in every field age limit is present then why politicians are away from that..as we all know young minds have young ideas hence it is not sensible to keep aged persons in politics ..youngsters are well aware of the present scenarios and from the problems that the country is facing..hence according to me youngsters should get the opportunity to get into politics but this is possible only when aged persons will retire first..for a better nation creative and young minds are required.therefore,there is nothing wrong in the retirement system

  61. Yogesh Ahirwar says:

    From my point of view there no age limit for the politicians from this is a social work which can be done in any age if the person interested to do some social work for the good will of society then they have to power to do it in any age , lots of government persons retires in the age of 60 then after the retirement they want to do some social work, then they all have to permit to do the social work and from my point of there should not be age limit in the politics….

  62. ANAND JAIN says:

    In a single line want to say….
    The brain of POLITICIANS and THIEVES never get old…
    & for politics we need a sharp brain…

    we can retire them but have to take their advice in all the decisions…

  63. Swatantra Singhal says:

    I totally agree with the post that there should be a age limit for the politicians because politicians should be young and have lots of stamina to do work for your country. In my opinions age limit should be 21 to 50, not more than that because after 50 years the politicians will not be able to do any work themselves for their country.

  64. Prateeksha Agnihotri says:

    ACCORDING TO ME THERE SHOULD BE AN AGE LIMIT ABOUT 50-60 YEARS FOR THE RETIREMENT IN POLITICS.BECAUSE IN EVERY JOB THERE IS A PROVISION OF RETIREMENT. CURRENTLY NOW SACHIN IS ALSO GIVEN THE RETIREMENT BY THE SAME THING PROCESS. EACH AND EVERY PERSON SHOULD GET CHANCE TO GET EMPOLYED IF THEY ARE SUITABLE TO BE OVER THERE WHEN THAT PARTICULAR ORGANISATION FEEL THAT THIS PERSON IS NO MORE SUITABLE FOR THAT JOB DUE TO PROBLEMS RELATED TO HIS/HER AGE.SO WHY NOT SO IN POLITICS ……POLTICIANS ALSO DO JOB AS A REPRESENTATIVES OF PEOPLE IN GOVERMENT. MOREOVER AFTER A PARTICULAR AGE LIMIT THERE IS NEED FOR THE OLD PEOPLE TO GET REST AS THE REWARD FEELS BY THEM OF DOING CONTINUOS JOB FOR OUR GOVT AND FOR OUR INDIA FOR 50-60 YEARS GIVEN BY INDIAN GOVT.

  65. Aashu Bhargava says:

    I am agree with this, we need to set a retirement age for politicians so that youth can replaces them to take our country’s economic & social growth to a greater extent. we see that the politicians of foreign countries like Pakistan, U.K, USA etc are of the age group 35-55 which is a suitable age for being an politician. at this age they have good experience, good potential to handle a country’s political thread.
    when came to Indian Politicians our most of the politicians are above 60 years of age which is an official age group of retire pensioner. this is a age when an individual should take rest at home & play with their grand son & do Bhajans. so in my opinion the retirement age for the politicians should be decided & motivate & encourage youths to enter in the politics

  66. gaurav sharma says:

    I would like to say that politicians must have a limited period of time to respond a perfect govt.
    Since, a politics must be regarded as dump .Nobody is ready to clean it up . As a young mind , can do it properly.
    As a young mind responsibility comes & must be thought of a nice government . we must go through various
    hard working stages. Since every politician must be retired from its proper age limit. As the politician is getting tired , and always old people is being selected for it, it must be stopped because the leaders(old age)
    are having no knowledge of latest technologies. With the advent of technology every thing is getting advanced if they can be compatible with it and also with proper action then only they should stand for it.

  67. akanksha chaturvedi says:

    In every field or I must say in every job we have a limit of age hence WHY TO BE SO BIASED WHEN IT COMES TO POLITICS?
    At the age of 60 we all know an individual become lethargic due to which the efficiency of his/her work is affected .
    Every individual has the right to live his life therefore we cannot take this right from them for the sake of the quality of work . In the present scenario our political structure is in dire need of youth so young minds should also be given chance in politics as we REALLY NEED INNOVATIVE AND PRACTICAL IDEAS so that we do not cripple as we are crippling in the present scenario due to poor political system.
    Therefore retirement should be in politics.

  68. Satendra Chauhan says:

    Well its a complicated thing in my point of view. when its a case of taking responsibility of our country,we do need a lot of experience, and experience comes with hardwork, and hardwork requires a lot of time. now if a person spends his whole life is building is value and gaining experience for the benefit of the country,we just cannot ask him to move out of the system.
    BUT
    There is a lot of difference between a younster and elderly peoples.youngsters are comperatively hot blooded and an excited bunch of fallow, probably have a dream to contribute more than that of elders.
    youngsters are less diplomatic and more straight forward whereas the opposite case is just vice-versa.

    Therefore,my suggestion is to have 2 seats for 1 post. An elder person to guide and express there expierenced view and a youngster to react and implement that thought.
    Re

  69. shailendra singh sikarwar says:

    Generally it has been seen that at the age of 55-60 a person becomes lazy and many health problems engulfs. At that span of time he loses his capability to think more effectively. As we know politicians are very crucial and important part of our country. So politicians should have retirement age.

  70. Satendra Chauhan says:

    i think there should be no age limit for the politicians” Because there is no age limit for doing work and a age factor doesn’t make any effect while working if a politician who is 60yrs old, and he is physically fit it doesn’t mean that he can’t work in this age. They have gain lot of experience through their carrier and they knows very well what is right or wrong. So by their experience they are capable for taking the right decision. but after a certain age, if a politician doesn’t feels physically good or feels that he is unable to give good services to his country..or his health is supporting him than retirement must be given to that people, Because it’s a question of future of our country.So it must taken seriously.
    There is not such provision that young guys can’t get entry in politics.if they want to contribute in the development of our country through politic,then they are always free to enter in the politics and can prove themselves with their energy, new innovation and Zeal!

  71. anil kushwah says:

    i think the age limit for the retirement for the politicians.
    because the after specfic age the brain not working the properly..
    i hahe fully supported the idea for retiarement the for the politicians..
    because the younge man the handle and inovative the mind satup ideas and the aurthity..

  72. Ankur Jalwankar says:

    According to my point of view there should be an age limit. In our country every field have some retirement age, but in politics no such age limit is there. Generally it has been seen that at the age of 55-60 a person becomes lazy and many health problems engulfs. At that span of time he loses his capability to think more effectively. As we know politicians are very crucial and important part of our country. So politicians should have retirement age. I feel it is good to give youth more opportunities because they are full of ideas and are energetic to their tasks. Youth are full of passion and they have capability to work with zeal and confidence. They are fresh minded and can take right decision. The decision taken by young person is dynamic According to my point of view there should be an age limit. In our country every field have some retirement age, but in politics no such age limit is there. Generally it has been seen that at the age of 55-60 a person becomes lazy and many health problems engulfs. At that span of time he loses his capability to think more effectively. As we know politicians are very crucial and important part of our country. So politicians should have retirement age. I feel it is good to give youth more opportunities because they are full of ideas and are energetic to their tasks. Youth are full of passion and they have capability to work with zeal and confidence. They are fresh minded and can take right decision. The decision taken by young person is dynamic

  73. mayur panjwani says:

    Politics follows the policy of “OLD IS GOLD”.Average age of Indian population is approx 65,therefore the retirement should be done at the age of 55-56.Best example of this is shown by Mulayam singh by giving chance to his son Akhilesh Yadav,the present Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh.If there is defined retirement age for many of Government workers such as IAS and IPS officers then why not of politician? Reason is every one know that a person can work at his/her best at young age when he/she is not struggling from any mental or physical problem.

  74. Shivam Tuteja says:

    Definitely age limit should be imposed in politics in order to speed up the growth of the country. The youth of the country are well versed with every day changing technology. Thus a combination of old horses along with strong shoulders of the youth. This will impose a deadly combination which will be a boon for the country. Thus having an age limit will help to the betterment of the country.

  75. Bhawana Sharma says:

    I think there should be an age limit in politics because after 50-60 a person is not able to do hard work. They becomes lazy and suffered from many deceased.So they are not able to take right decisions for country which is very important.As the politicions are the very crucial part of country so they have to take the right decisions and do hard work.In our country 90% of politicions are above 60.So this should be changed. Government should elect the youths for politics because they know what the world needs today.They are fresh minded and energetic with great zeal and able to take dynamic decisions.Today the youths are going abroad for seeking job but they can got a better opportunity in their country. They have a better job in politics . They are able to take right decisions so i think the government of India should restrict above 60.In other countries there is a restriction thats why they are performing well than us so we should also work on it.Elect youths so they work to change the democracy.Youths are better for dynamic change for politics. Elect them because country needs new ideas to run. thnxxx…………:-):-)

  76. Piyush Jain says:

    i am agree with you on this topic that politicians should a have an age limit or retirement as we saw average age of india’s cabinet is 67 according to 2009 election. so there is need that there should be age limit for the politicians too, also the voters should be aware about all the facts of the candidates who is standing from there constituency and should not give vote to that person. also young peoples should come forward with good innovative ideas and great vision about future having good leadership techniques and also they are aware about the new technology which are evolving. so there should be age limit for the politicians too.

  77. Rahul Singh says:

    Yes, i totally agree with the topic that we should have age limit for the politician because youth should also be involve in politics but the leading politician which is leading any particular party do not want to leave there power and there position so because of these reason youth is restricted to there college and university so there must be an age limit so these old politician which is not be able to make good decision after a certain time so there place must be given ti the young leader so they can make some good decision for youth and all society with there good decision making.
    So, there must be a age limit of retirement for politician that will give chance to youth leaders….

  78. Amit Gupta says:

    Yeah exactly, i m completely agree with the satatement , politicians should must have a retirement age.As we all know that more than 80% of our politicians are older than 60, because of their age they generally might not efficient as they need to be, they should leave the polictics and provide opportunities to the youngsters , as we all know more than 60% of Indian population are young.
    They will work more efficiently .Elder politicians are supposed to support them by suggesting their views. This will also helpful for the development of a Country.
    Acc. to my point of view, their should be an age limit for politicians thats why i completely agreed with the statement ………… 🙂

  79. Aarika Dubey says:

    yes, for me their should be an age limit in the politics as “the old leaves detach new leaves come” and same is the case here instead of including older people younger generation should be given chance
    as it brings new ideas and methodology in the system . every sector here has retirement in their domains so why not government

  80. Akash Awasthi says:

    In every field we had retirement. But we cannot see retirement in politics. The politicians were ruling till their last breathe. This means I was not against them. I suppose to say that they should live peacefully in the their last days. This may also provide better opportunities for the youth.

  81. DEVESH TRIPATHI says:

    Of course I do feel that there should be a retiring age for politicians as well.
    Our country with such a huge population is full of enthusiastic and dynamic young personalities who can take strong and tough decisions as well.
    We need our leaders to think out of the box. We need a change in vision of the politicians.
    This change can only be provided by the youth only. We can not expect from a older politician to think in the same manner as a young mind does, a generation void comes into act thereby.
    This void can be removed only if we ask our politicians to retire and request them to guide the young leaders through their experiences.

  82. Ankur Jalwankar says:

    the politicians age dose matter better politic because the age is more effective for do the work.
    my point of view there should be an age limit. In our country every field have some retirement age, but in politics no such age limit is there. Generally it has been seen that at the age of 55-60 a person becomes lazy and many health problems engulfs. At that span of time he loses his capability to think more effectively. As we know politicians are very crucial and important part of our country. So politicians should have retirement age. I feel it is good to give youth more opportunities because they are full of ideas and are energetic to their tasks. Youth are full of passion and they have capability to work with zeal and confidence. They are fresh minded and can take right decision. now our politicians age is above 70+ so they do not better work as compare to to 50+. As they are young they could easily connect with any group of society.they are friendly for particular age group
    so my view is th eage limit is more importent for our country.

  83. Shivam Tuteja says:

    Age limit in politics will be a plus pint if we want to see our country develop at a much greater rate. The country can speed up its progress under the leadership of fresh minds and strong shoulders of the youth.The youth are well versed with new technologies that are changing. Along with the experience of old horses combined with the passion of the youth will help for the betterment of the country. This can only happen if age limit is applied in politics as well.

  84. sonu sharma says:

    ya i appriceat wd ur topic ….beause ydi hum dekhe ki hamari politics sare old persen hai …aur hame yuva ki jarrurat hai …kyuki yuva hi hamare desh ko sambhal sakta hai …..aur i think bhale hi old person ko experiences ho bt mere khayal se young ko b moka dena chaiye ….tabhi to unhe b experiences hoga h na

  85. upendra goswami says:

    In our country every field have some retirement age, but in politics no such age limit is there. Generally it has been seen that at the age of 55-60 a person becomes lazy and many health problems engulfs. At that span of time he loses his capability to think more effectively.
    So ,the conclusion is there should be retirement for the politcians.
    the more they grow ,more they loose the leadership quality .
    the new generation shuold get chance for elections ,to become an leader or minister to run the country with leadership quality .
    now a time to move with a good leader which can lead properly with no corruption

    Every politicians should have there age limit for retirement ,so the yonger one politician should get chance to run the government .

    *””It is more important to make a good government with age factor ,so there should be a retirement age for politicians””*

  86. gagan malik says:

    my point of view on this topic there should be a age limit for retirement for politicians.because if there is no age limit of retirement max age of people are stand in politics and there is no chance for youth.
    in the our goverment there are many of aged people are in the goverment and youth are not involved to this.
    thats why youth are not involved in plitics as well . so if we want to progressive india there should be a age limit for retirement.

  87. rakesh kushwah says:

    age limit for the politician is to fix because stage of human being at older age they disturbance and misbehave and mentality of people will also change.

  88. ankit singh says:

    Yes ‘I totally agree that, a politician has to have a retirement age, because politicians are very crucial and imperative towards the country. Generally after the age of 50 a person becomes lazy, inculcates many health problems and as they loose there capability to think more effectively and work more positively. And I thing that it is good to give youths more opportunities than giving an aged person because youths are full of ideas and are energetic in their task.

  89. Gaurav Agrawal says:

    As we know that there is some limited age till a person can work well. If a person who is more than 60 is hyper for a small things. He is angry for very small things . At that age person is not able to work well.

    This same thing is for a Polictician , there must be age limit for the Retirement of an politician .

    some more regions are,

    elder people are not think straight forward .They are diplomatic like. so There is a lot of difference between a younster and elderly peoples.youngsters are comperatively hot blooded and an excited bunch of fallow, probably have a dream to contribute more than that of elders.
    youngsters are less diplomatic and more straight forward whereas the opposite case is just vice-versa.

  90. Akriti Gupta says:

    According to me the age limit must be there, A politician cant work till his/her death. Politician must have the age limit above 25 and below 65.Science had proved that after some age limit the human thinking gets low he/she cant have the same memory power as had earlier and also proved that the people have a best working and sharp mind in its age limit and it also does not depend on the work experience. age limit is necessary because in every govt department there is an age limit . but in politics there is no age limit .
    in politics there must be age limit

  91. Deepanjali Pahariya says:

    From my point of view ,retirement for every person in every field is necessary because everyone needs rest after a certain age.
    we in this scenario ,seeing that changes are coming rapidly and the good thing is people are also adopting it quickly,so if a person with old thinking would continue to work,clashes will occur between the new generation and the government,so to deal with it,new people should come into picture and make changes such as enforcing lokpal bill .
    the recent issues which are coming like Delhi gang rape case ,people are asking for justice but government is taking a lot of time this ia also a major issue with old people.

  92. Ankita Khare says:

    Yes i totally agree that there should be some age limit for the politician. In our constitution there is no retirement age for politician and that is what the politician was politician , is politician and will be politician forever .

    We can take the example of Congress who dominates India when the India Got Independent.
    And now they get such a power that no one can replace them untill some momemt like by Anna Hazare will not occur.

    Also new generation comes with new thoughts and Ideas and this will be very beneficial for every one.

    Discarding the fact the more work give more experience ,,,the indian goverment decided the age limit for every departmet wheather it teacher, doctor, judge, commisionar etc. Then why don’t they decide age limit for themselves also. AS experienced teacher can give more knowledge to the student but he also retired from his post then why not poliAtician. So according to me they must be retired from his post also

  93. Vikas Mandeliya says:

    yes i am totally with this point that there should be an age limit for politicians.an younger brain do better work.an we can see of BARAK OBAMA.
    BARAK OBAMA is a younger politicians of U.S.

    We have to be as modern to consider the fact that a young person can also handle the politics. And there should not be any age restriction in this. As every one has seen the famous movie ” nayak ” in there also anil kapoor has handled the country very well then that corrupt politician.

  94. Abhi Kaushik says:

    YES I STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT RETIREMENT SHOULD BE IN THIS FIELD OF POLITICS ALSO.
    As there is a retirement age in every job profile in our country then why should this field be left . As we all are aware that the common reason given for the retirement in different professions is that the services are no longer required as the vision and the inventory of the top brass is no longer able to give a better direction to the organization then WHAT ABOUT THE POLITICIANS WHICH ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE GROWTH OF THE COUNTRY AND ITS BILLIONS OF CITIZENS , A NEW THOUGHT PROCESS IS REQUIRED AND FOR THAT THERE SHOULD BE A RETIREMENT AGE IN POLITICS.

  95. Ada Gul says:

    the age limit should not have for politicians because., it is practically proved that more experience in politics , more beneficial for politician . the politics is a deep and dangerous and deep sea , it requied more practice of swimming like that to guide the new people in the politics senior politician should be present in this field.

  96. Honey Rohira says:

    According to me, “Youth is not useless youth is usedless” & there must be a certain age limit & one more thing as we said Old is gold – is good & applicable only for some things. In India & in Politics it has become ‘Too old is gold’. Only ‘old’ is good & better, but ‘too old’ is too much & that is why Indian politics is going directionless. Young politicians are very good & brilliant in tackling the political issues as compared to their older/elder politicians.
    Also there should be age limit fixed after which he should be retired.
    As oldman stick to their comfort zone rather than venture out, they tend to project their times, their homes and places that may alienate them from people who are different. They lose their appeal electorally and politically. You must get along with people. ‘In order to get along go along!’

    Example: I have a friend who’s sister in law recently died of Alzheimer’s. She was 52. My father-in-law was still as smart as a whip until age 89, then started to decline rather rapidly. It depends on the genes you were born with.

  97. Reena Kushwah says:

    In my opinion, yes politician should have age limit or retirement because as we know all kind of job it could be private or governments.every politician also have a certain limit on which they can stop their working.at the old age they are not able to hard work n also they could be face many kind of problem in the old age like weakness, less activeness etc.

    that’s why they are also not make new ideas and creative fact to development country .
    To build a better infrastructure politician should be travel in different country that old politician can’t do.so in the politics a certain age limit and retirement should be apply soon.that’s it.

  98. Prerana Gupta says:

    i think that age limits should be for politicians because young minds have more potential and bright ideas than a person of age above 55-60 i agree that old peop[le are more experienced than youngsters but i think that only experience dont work out it is the ideas and thinking power that mattrs a lot so if old politicians will retire then only young minds will get chance and i think our country needs young and hot bloods

  99. vipin chaturvedi says:

    there should be an age limit. In our country every field have some retirement age, but in politics no such age limit is there. Generally it has been seen that at the age of 55-60 a person becomes lazy and many health problems engulfs. At that span of time he loses his capability to think more effectively.i think youth of our country have high capability to take currect and quick dicesions.if there will be retirement age for politions …youth will get change take this opportunity on his shoulders.

  100. Bhawna Pathak says:

    I think there should be some age limit for the retirement of politicians because everyone should get chance to show their innovations,creativity,decision making skills and leadership quality.As old persons does not think in a way as today’s youth will think and also they are not so much energetic as youths.Old age politicians also will not create any type of bond with young persons and do not understand their emotions easily.If there is any youth in politics then he will take decisions which is quite favorable for youth’s life which in turn will result a good development of our country.As we also know that old persons will have their health problems and they are also not so active for performing their duties.they do not take decisions actively.
    At last my view is that there should be some age limit to show everyone their talent’s and so that everyone will get some chance

  101. vipin chaturvedi says:

    I TOTALLY agree with it, there should be an age limit. In our country every field have some retirement age, but in politics no such age limit is there. Generally it has been seen that at the age of 55-60 a person becomes lazy and many health problems engulfs. At that span of time he loses his capability to think more effectively.i think youth of our country have high capability to take currect and quick dicesions.if there will be retirement age for politions …youth will get change take this opportunity on his shoulders.

  102. Vipin Gupta says:

    i think age limit will be considered for retirement of politicians because young people and middle-aged person can take right decision..
    they are more active and knowledge person in comparison to old one…
    there are so many example of this where people changed country into a new era….

  103. Mohini Lakher says:

    One important line is there that More experience more sucess. I do not think that there should be age limit in politicians. Matter is not that experinced or aged people can not take good decision. Expericed people have both aspect political knowledge also corruption knowledge. They can be give better views about systems.It not be must that Younger politicians could think different impotrtance is that politicians should not be corrupted.
    Yes it is true that younger politicians can think accordingly youth’s life and youth’s problem. Such an example youth against raped crime in our country. I think both combination musr be in our politicians.
    Problem in our politics is that nobody corruption free. So condition is not improving.

  104. Hope Desire says:

    There should be have a retirement for all the politicians. Because :-

    1) They have experience but they may not be able to take actions during some social things.
    2) Many young politicians should get chance to bring out the technologies.
    3) Young politicians are more qualified and they have ability to take decision more faster they like to take RISKS and see the results.
    4) Many other new platforms are known or aware to young politicians so they can better be able to deal with it and make it more useful.
    5) Young politicians are able to handle and answer the young generations more friendly.

    So there should be age limit for retirement for all the politicians and give chances to all the young politicians.

  105. ankit sapkal says:

    YES I AM WITH THE AUTHOR THERE SHOULD BE AN RETIREMENT AGE for the politicians .As our youth get chance to show there work towards society.
    thank you!!!!
    🙂 🙂

  106. Aporup Ghoshal says:

    Surely in my opinion there must be an age restriction for the politicians because this only the way the youth can be given the chance that they deserve.As according to the government rules age of 60 is considered as the age for retirement so this rule must also be implied on the politicians.As after the retirement of those politician youth can be given the chance and which will definitely help to bring the fresh ideas and moral values that every nation strive for.
    If there is no retirement age this would definitely create a havoc in the difference of mentality of the two generation and this could proved to be fatal for nation’s achievement.

  107. Dhanshree Ketkar says:

    yes there should be age limit in the politics since youth have more innovative ideas and they work with more zeal and enthusiasm. As youth can understand needs of today’s generation more easily and appropriately.

    Though, experience matters a lot in such work which a aged politician has. To resolve this problem after a certain age limit, aged politicians can be kept as the advisers for their party. This combination of youth’s energy and aged politician’s experience will work much better to administer the nation.

  108. madhuri ojha says:

    According to my point of view there should be an age limit. In our country every field have some retirement age, but in politics no such age limit is there. Generally it has been seen that at the age of 55-60 a person becomes lazy and many health problems engulfs. At that span of time he loses his capability to think more effectively. As we know politicians are very crucial and important part of our country. So politicians should have retirement age. I feel it is good to give youth more opportunities because they are full of ideas and are energetic to their tasks. Youth are full of passion and they have capability to work with zeal and confidence. They are fresh minded and can take right decision. The decision taken by young person is dynamic. Ifthere willbe age limit then young generation will get chance to prove themselves. Now a day’s more than 90 % of Indian politicians are above 60. Just because there is no age limit, a politician continues to do his job until he is alive.
    Although experience is necessary to handle the country but that much experience can be achieved by the young person by hard work….and so many persons are there who are doing very much effort to get some opportunity.

  109. Amit Rathore says:

    inmy opinion there should be an age limit. In our country every field have some retirement age, but in politics no such age limit is there. Generally it has been seen that at the age of 55-60 a person becomes lazy and many health problems engulfs. At that span of time he loses his capability to think more effectively. As we know politicians are very crucial and important part of our country. So politicians should have retirement age. I feel it is good to give youth more opportunities because they are full of ideas and are energetic to their tasks. Youth are full of passion and they have capability to work with zeal and confidence. They are fresh minded and can take right decision. The decision taken by young person is dynamic. If there will be age limit then young generation will get chance to prove themselves. Now a day’s more than 90 % of Indian politicians are above 60. Just because there is no age limit, a politician continues to do his job until he is alive. I know they have experience but after a certain age limit they are not able to work so effectively which automatically lowers the development of our country. Due to lack of job opportunities many youngsters are going to foreign countries for higher education or in seek of good job. Youth should be given opportunity in politics. Just because of such elder politician our young generation have to suffer from unemployment and all..so i think it gives the chance to our youngesters

  110. Madhuri Upadhyay says:

    Yes I think there should be an age limit for the retirement of the politians because..as the politians come in power..in the begining some of them have a spirit of doing good for the society..but after a long time they lose that spirit and become habitual and addicted to the filthy character of politics.

    They are exposed to the various wrong acts such as corruption… and ultimately they are of no use for the nation.

    So there must be an age limit for the retirement of politians..!

  111. Shreya Dandotia says:

    I think, yes there should be an age limit for for politicians because being on one chair for their whole life is not good for the country as well as for the youth. As youth is more interactive and have many innovetive ideas to run the country or to any nation. Youth should given a chance to get selected in poltitics and the politicians should retire after the agr of 55 or 60, as it happen in other jobs. The retirement procedure or the age limit should be their because young people are more towards new ideas and can work according to the people.

  112. komal sharma says:

    Very necessary point , in my opinion , there should be strict enforcement of age limit in politics . A valid point to this is generally a normal human being has different efficiencies is at different period of life time of working. A 30 yr old man can work more efficiently than a 60 yr old man. Apart from working efficiently ,its about the new ideas and thoughts required for a country to work properly. So in politics a age limit should be implemented to welcome young aspiring minds and new technology so that india can have a growth in terms technology and economy…

  113. Pulkit Vohra says:

    Definately, there should be an age limit or a retirement age for politicians. ]
    In the major sectors there is always a retirement age for a person. There is a reason behind this policy. A person’s physical activity and thinking power decreases as he gets older. In the scenario where there is a need of quick thinking or a hectic physical activity, a person with older age will not be able to respond with full comittment. It is a human fact.
    This very truth applies to the politics also. We can have a multiple examples of the persons of younger age who proved to be a good politician and a good leader. The best example is the Barack Obama, the president of the United States. Being a young politician will not only be popular aming the youth, which is the largest community among all others but also will be a quick thinker and a quick responder that will be helpful to take the decisions more effectively.
    If in case an age limi is decided for the politicians, after retirement, they can share their political knowledge to their young generations and can act as the back end of the politics, younger politicians being the front end.

  114. apoorva agarwal says:

    From my point of view there should be a age limit for politicians because every department has a age limit So WHY NOT FOR POLITICTIANS?
    How can the new generation can work for the development of the country . They also have innovative ideas . We have to give chance to the new generation . As every person has a limit of working efficiently. old politicians can’t work effectively.
    Is Iam right friends?

  115. Shreya gupta says:

    No, there must not be an age limit for retirement of politicians. We can certainy say that aged people know about the situation in the past as well as the present and deciding on these factors they can seek towards the future needs as well, it is also a fact age does not deteorate the intelligency of a person.

    We can have a well defined example of Mahatma Gandhi , being at his old age he changed the scenerio of the present and gave a secured future of the people.

    But this does not mean that youth cannot be given a chance , youth must be checked while giving them such control over the country.

    A person who does not fit or say cannot solve the arising problems should not be allowed to come into politics ,it does not matter how young or old he or she is .

    Moreover, advice of an experienced person might be of some use to the young. The old politicians should be put in some advisory board that may guide the young and inexperienced according to their abilities.
    So in my opinion, no ,there should be an age -restriction, young should be allowed according to their capabilities and must be given equal chance, and the old politicians should make an advisory board that can guide the young.

  116. aditi gupta says:

    yes it think that we must have an age limit for politicitons. This is because in india we have politicians only to earn money and doing time pass.If we see other countries like uk ertc we see that aal the ministers present there are young. So they can employ their new innovative ideas to the progreess of the nation. But in india we mostly have old ge people who are harldly interested in politics.

    So in my opinion we must employ an age limit so that young generation may come up and put their new ideas forward

  117. Mukul Agarwal says:

    We have to be as modern to consider the fact that a young person can also handle the politics. Yes there should be age limit for politicians as the young people has more innovative ideas and views for any situation.For example. as every one has seen the famous movie ” nayak ” in there also anil kapoor has handled the country very well. Our youngsters didn’t get chance in politics, youngsters are full of creativity,talent and of new ideas.

    For betterment, instead of age limit we should better suggest for retirements on health baasis because there are certain unhealthy youths as well as many healthy old leaders.Moreover proper selection of people on the basis of their health, knowledge etc. will surely work much better than retiring them at some age limit

    Reply ↓

  118. Sourabh MIshra says:

    In my view there should be an age limit. In our country every field have some retirement age, but the politics is the only thing in which no such age limit is there. At that span of time he loses his capability to think more effectively. As we know politicians are very crucial and important part of our country. So politicians should have retirement age. I feel it is good to give youth more opportunities because they are full of ideas and are energetic to their tasks. Generally it has been seen that at the age of 60 to 65 years a person becomes lazy and many health problems, still he is a political leader to lead the particular region of the country.
    Youth are full of passion and they have capability and confidence. They are fresh minded and can take right decision. The decision taken by young person is dynamic. If there will be age limit then young generation will get chance to prove themselves. Now a day’s more than 90 % of Indian politicians are above 60. Just because there is no age limit, a politician continues to do his job until he is alive.
    If there will be age limit at least new political leaders will grow and this may lead to proper functioning of the political system.

  119. varsha bansal says:

    hello friends,
    According to me this totally depends on the mind of the particular person. There are some polititions in India who are working well and their age is above 65 like Mr. Narendra Modi. Politics needs experience and the capability to handle with the different situations. Atal Bihari Vajapi was also a great politition and besides his age he does very good job in the development of India as a prime Minister.
    Also the old people have experience. There are many examples where we get that the aged people done excellent work for the growth of the nation instead of their ages.
    Thank you.

  120. Riya Sharma says:

    I don’t think that age has to do much with one’s political carrier as we see that many of the posts having higher responsibility are occupied by senior citizens and it is fair enough as they have gained much experience through their lives which would help them to take right decisions in favour of our country But at the same time I also agree with the fact that young people should be given fair chance to prove their worth in Politics as Young People are the future of our country and if they are not given enough chances then it would prove to be a great loss.

  121. nidhi singh says:

    Politicians must have some age limit because in our country we have politicians that can’t even walk, talk or are admitted in hospitals, how will these people lead the nation or how will they contribute in any way towards the growth of the country. I don’t know why such special privileges are given to politicians, when we have an age limit in every job or field, then why not politics? We need young and aspiring minds that will become the future leaders of the nation who have new ideas. To make way for the young ones, the old ones who cant contribute to the nation because of the health and other issues, must retire. We all know that every human weakens with age, so do politicians, so they must be given rest.

  122. Bageshri Sharma says:

    In my point of view there should be an age limit in politics.

    We can see that ,now a days in every field there is an age limit. So why not in that field.
    If age limit is define , then new generation can get chance. This is 21st century. New generation know what this ganeration want .

    Now a days we can see that more than 80% politicionb are above 60.
    they are not stronger than our new ganaration. They became lazy and they actually don’t know What next generation want.

    If age limit will define, then after 60 they got retirenment and youth get chance.

    And because of this youth have lot of job oppourtunity in politics.
    and our nation growth increase easily.

  123. Doll Gupta says:

    as far as i am concern,the age limit should be there because the older people are not aware about the latest technologies and they are not take good decision after the age because they think as a older generation.

  124. khushboo yadav says:

    yes should we have age limit of reteirment of politision because every person belong to particular time and generation so they not compete to new generation so it neccesory to give the society on right hand they can understand very well and run it.

  125. Pratima Mahajan says:

    As my concern there should be age limit for politicians,,because if there is no age limit then new people will not be able to deliver our ideos,thoughts etc.And i think they have more innovative knowlege insist of old politicians…they easily understand the resposibilities,nd handle the people of our country in a vewry efficient manner because they know the every needs which people wants…

  126. Tushita Das says:

    In my point of view, it is a social work & for that there is no age limit . For society if someone is really dedicated to his responsibility then he can do his work in any of his age.

    1. We have two groups of peoples consisting of young and old. The young are newly, having more efficiency to work, more passionate and fresh minded. They have fast tendency to react to any decision.

    2. Secondly we have old, I do not go for the statement that old is gold because the gold is gold only and cannot be compared to any age group, the work should be gold whether it is accomplished by young or old. But the thing is there, the old are having an immense experience of life, decision, work, they will surely think ten times to take any work to be done out in a positive aspect as they might have had gone through it earlier.
    That is why old is needed with the young too. So there should be no retirement.

  127. varsha shivhare says:

    I support the idea of having age limit in politics as our youth has lot of new ideas and thoughts regarding new flow of change in democracy. They give new direction of thinking, taking decisions. Diversity should be maintained as youth is hot blooded and older persons are cold blooded but bloods are equally important for the progress of country. Youth are full of ideas and are energetic, active, can work in hectic environmental condition but lacks in experience. And just opposite in older politicians the are lethargic, less active and cannot work in hectic environment but they have vast knowledge which cost too much to our country. Actually politicians work in very responsible task and we have to represent our country in world. So using activeness ideas as well as experience can improve the conditions of country and helpful to citizens as well as our country.

  128. urvashi khatuja says:

    yes their should be an age limit for politicians because we should have to give chance to youngsters also !! as we know that the first person of country is president so their should be an age limit for president because age refers to thought differences and a youngster can surely perform a better work as compared to an aged person . an aged person cannot think upto that perspective an an youngster can think

  129. sumit agrawal says:

    We have to be as modern to consider the fact that a young person can also handle the politics. And there should not be any age restriction in this.
    The age should not be the criteria the persons qualification and his presence of mind, experience should be the criteria.

    Atal bihari Bajpee and narender modhi are to aged persons but they proved to be the great politicians their loss will be big, i think the command of India should be in the hands of experience hands only so, their should be not be any rule of age limit.

    There is a lot of difference between a younster and elderly peoples.Youngsters are comperatively hot blooded and an excited bunch of fallow, probably have a dream to contribute more than that of elders

  130. Anurag Patsariya says:

    Thinking process, hardworking capabilities also ages with the time and once age. Politicians have a huge responsibility of millions of people, so it has to be a enthusiastic and morden world acceptable and compatible. Aged person should not be on the elected posts and only their experiences should be used.. And many new candidates should be given the chance as they can have new ideas and passion to hard work..

  131. Riddhi Pol says:

    HI EVERYONE….!!!!

    Retirement or age limit should also be the same for politicians…. as youth today is much much smarter and can get more ideas to tackle the problems…. its good to have the experienced parliament so as to have the better results… but still in my views i think the youth should be given chance to deal with it… n it can be under the guidance of the experienced one…. so that he can be taught n which will be much more beneficial for our wealth… As for an example Atal Bihari Vajpai and Narendra Modi…. still doing their best for the betterment of the nation…. they should be considered n should guide the youth….!!!!

    THANK YOU FOR READING…..!!!!

  132. mumuksha gupta says:

    ~~ I guess there must be an age limit for the politicians. Those retired politicians should give their experience to the new comers. So that they can combine their ideas with experience and take our country to a good height.

    Experience + Innovative Mind = Efficient & Beneficial Results for Country!

  133. arvind thakur says:

    yes offcourse it should be necessary b’coz you know that the Indian politics is a like a loop wholes. their is a chance but not totally utilized by youngsters. b’coz as usually we know that if any youngster wants to enetr in the politics their are no kind to grow the moral of him just b’coz of some many power full polititians which are misused his power and money. so now , it would be necessary to be their a age limit or retirement deadline. and also needs to reduce the age criteria to enter in the politics as point of view of youngsters. b’coz i think we are understands better about our country and related problems. and i want their be chance to taken a reference from our seniors to help and sort out our probs which are occur.

  134. Arpan Tripathi says:

    yes i thing there must be a upper and lower limil as well for becoome a politician …….in respect to lower limit i want to say before 25 wee generally not matured properly because we dont have any resposibility
    and for become a politician you must be able to undersatndpeople need and their demand for that
    in respect to upper limit i thing upper limit is also important because at some level people completely need rest there fore to work efficienty we need energetic people so there must be an upper limit .

  135. rahul upadhyay says:

    yes … should we have a age limit for a politician. older politician are not capable for t6ake a right decision in favour of our country. then are not more educated. they can’t think more about our country. if we want to a good developing country and right thinking then we should a chance of youngest and highly educated person . who could understand the critical problem and seriously take it and easy solve it. these youngest politician increase the strength of our country. so we should give a chance of youngest person. and this time whose older politician are in the politics. then government should take a action for this and will retired to them. because new think …….make a new country. and as for as i am concern whose person which are doing for our country and have a good think and they are educated but they are older . then in this situation we should not retire the older politician.

  136. papakipari gupta says:

    No age limit in politics doesnot matter in polictics because if a person has the patriotic feeling for his country and wants to serve the country then his age is not a problem.They may have better ideas and futuristic plans than others and with help of mass of people and youths strength it will help in realising a world which more peaceful and secular.since its said OLD IS GOLD and older ones are more experience holers they have seen the histoey living in present and help in making a better tomorrow.They can provide good directions to youths and when there ides merge with youths understanding it will create a better tomorrow.

  137. NAMEETA ANAND says:

    Yes, there should be age limit for politicians. In every sector, we have a retirement age, then why not politics?

    People have started seeing this as an back up option. Because a person can work for years and can make money. Politicians are people who have command on our nation and we cannot let ourselves go in hands of those people who are just here for making money.

    Even criminals and uneducated people too look politics as an easy way to earn. They look politics as an option, where they can make money and have a good position. This is simply encouraging unlawful acts and deteriorating our position on global front.

    Law for retirement age in politics will provide opportunities to young generation to be a part of Indian politics.

  138. Ruchi Tiwari says:

    Off course i do agree that politicians should have an age limit to retire
    we can simply see that there is huge difference in the thinking and mentality of our generation and our grandparents generation.
    they are not exposed to new technologies, not too much interested in knowing what is happening in other parts of the world. they are much interested in sharing their own experiences and guiding and telling how things happen at their times.
    so should be the case with politics.
    there should be an age limit of 60 years as we have in other fields to retire so that younger ones can come forward and take the social responsibility.

    at present the average age of a member of parliament is 66 years, our prime minister is 78 and our president is above 80. its just as we are following not republican but psychiatric constitution. Is this the are the right people to decide what are the demand of young India????

    I don’t say that older one should be completely removed , they may take the responsibility of guiding the younger ones from their own experiences and simultaneous making way for the younger generation to come up and take this social field.

  139. Ruchi Tiwari says:

    Off course i do agree that politicians should have an age limit to retire
    we can simply see that there is huge difference in the thinking and mentality of our generation and our grandparents generation.
    they are not exposed to new technologies, not too much interested in knowing what is happening in other parts of the world. they are much interested in sharing their own experiences and guiding and telling how things happen at their times.
    so should be the case with politics.
    there should be an age limit of 60 years as we have in other fields to retire so that younger ones can come forward and take the social responsibility.

    at present the average age of a member of parliament is 66 years, our prime minister is 78 and our president is above 80. its just as we are following not republican but psychiatric constitution. Is this the are the right people to decide what are the demand of young India????

    I don’t say that older one should be completely removed , they may take the responsibility of guiding the younger ones from their own experiences and simultaneous making way for the younger generation to come up and take this social field.

  140. priyanka bansal says:

    yes there should be a age limit for politicians.we all know that each sector have a retirement age so why politician are not .according to my age limit is help to develop the country .we all know that the old person is act like a child .they are not able to take good decesion.
    i think our country required more youngster politician because they have innovative idea to develop the country. i think the age of politician is in between 35-60 that they have a experience as well as idea which is help to develop the country.
    like we take the example of president of America and president of India why America president is more popular because he is more energetic.he is youngest person etc.
    so for betterment of future our politician should be in age limit…….

  141. Taniya Vohra says:

    In my point of view,the politicians are, somewhere or the other , serving the country.The future of our country is in their hands and somewhere or the other they are the deciding factors. So if they are doing justice with the responsibility given to them,they should continue doing it with full dedication as it is a kind of a social work and there is no age of doing the work for society. So in this case,they should not get retired and serve the country.But, as exceptions are always there.In present scenario,the service is given to there own family rather than the common people.Taking into account ,there work or responsibility towards the country,the decision should be made.

  142. shivani gupta says:

    i am fully supported with this topic. i am agree with that old people have more experience than youth. But they dont ready for taking risk. I think its the time for taking risk and for applying new ideas for developing our country.
    Youth are very energetic and they have new ideas. we can see the most important example of damini rape case in delhi. They are striking together for damini and all girls. We can see the example of Anna Hazare movement in all case youth are present. Because they are aware. And they want only the benifit of our country.
    In our country, most of the politician are above 50 or 60 years.Even president is also above 60 years. In America they give chance to OBAMA and see America is progressing continuously. They again gave a chance to OBAMA.
    So at last i would like to say that youth are more energetic, have more eagerness and they are ready to taking risk. Now the time for resigning the old politicians and give chance to youth for the bright future of our country.

  143. Priya gupta says:

    In my point of view ,i think there should be an age limit for retirement of politicians as we all know many of the politicians in our country are above 60 years and they are still in a party head team.
    what i think is that the opportunity should be given to youngsters because they knows well what is the need and problems of today’s world. They understands well the steps to be taken to solve the current problems .person above 60 years becomes lazy and don’t have that much presence of mind.
    senior politicians should be present for suggestions and the guidance for youth ,so that they will also come to know about how the seniors work .
    youths are the future of our country so let them know how to handle the situation in a better way .i would also like to give my views on corruption ,we all know corruption is increasing day by day mostly in this field senior politicians are lazy and want to earn money sitting at their home.so we all should concentrate on it .seniors should not be allowed to do so .
    this is all what i can say that the change will be there only when we decide to do it may be in any condition.

  144. Jagriti Singh says:

    yes there should be age limit for politicians as the young people has more innovative ideas and views for any situation. According to me i guess the age limit does not matter if the person who has authority, knows and understands the responsibility of his then he should work until he wants to do or until he wants the retirement. Apart from this the experience also matters as the person who has more experience can work better hence there occur no issue of age.

    • Anil Rathor says:

      it is desired that there should be age limit for the politicians like other professions.
      we all know at present there is very less number of young politicians who are highly active and serving well.
      it is always advised by our present politicians that youth should join the politics but none of them wants to leave it so scope for youth is reduced to take part and could run the politics and government according to them.
      so there should we age limit for politicians to encourage the present generation.

  145. BHARAT GAUTAM says:

    We have to be as modern to consider the fact that a young person can also handle the politics. And there should not be any age restriction in this. As every one has seen the famous movie ” nayak ” in there also anil kapoor has handled the country very well then that corrupt politician.

    Although experience is necessary to handle the country but that much experience can be achieved by the young person by hard work….and so many persons are there who are doing very much effort to get some opportunity.

  146. Swarnima Gupta says:

    I fully support this idea of having age limit in politics.Though it is is considerable to have experienced people in parliament to provide guidance & foresee the consequences of any act but it is of equal importance to provide young minds equal opportunity to come up with their innovative ideas for rapid development of any nation. Young candidates have energy & zeal to do & achieve something big for their nation which greatly contributes to upliftment of any nation. As they are young they could easily connect with any group of society and they would be aware of recent upcoming problems for which they could prepare themselves & prepare their action plan accordingly. Setting an age limit in politics would help maintaining this balance of of innovation and experience.

  147. Abhishek Gupta says:

    There is no need for age restrictions in the politics as it is a social platform and until the individual finds himself or herself fit for the job he can do it but the individual should be efficient enough in doing his or her job. Also there are areas which require more experience to handle the situation arises and decisions are taken on the basis of past experience so there is aged people are more preferable than youngsters. there are many examples where we get that the aged people done excellent work for the growth of the nation instead of their ages.

  148. akash gupta says:

    I personally think that their should not be an age limit for the retirement age should not decide that which politician is good or bad ,it may happen that the aged politician experience and fairness can help india grow at the faster rate. I personally think that their should be a rule that their would be only one person from each family who will be given a ticket.
    Atal bihari Bajpee and narender modhi are to aged persons but they proved to be the great politicians their loss will be big, i think the command of India should be in the hands of experience hands only so, their should be not be any rule of age limit.
    The age should not be the criteria the persons qualification and his presence of mind, experience should be the criteria.

  149. Nitin Kalani says:

    it is totally depedent on situation ,in gujrat narendra modi is good working but he is also old. Except some situation it is good that there is age limit on retirement of politicians because new people come into politics therefore new idias are also have in mind so the growth of country is increase.as the new people are youth so they have very creative ideas in mind which help in developing our country

  150. rohit kumar bhutiya says:

    yes!! there should be an age limit for the politicians. those retirered politicians should give their experience to the new comers. so that they can combine their ideas with experience and take our country to a good height

  151. samiksha yadav says:

    ACCORDING to my view there is no age limit in the system because in many cases we need experince , but many time the experince man not take a fast decision at that time we need a youth . so in the political party we have both . by that our country moves forward and good growth and we choose good leader for our country its all depends our votes.

  152. Gaurav Garg says:

    I am fully agree with this that there will be age limit for politicians. Because of these our youngsters didn’t get chance in politics youngsters are full of creativity,talent,new ideas. They can take our country up to a high level as compare to old politicians in developed country all president are youngsters and they are working very well. so there will be age limit for youngster.

  153. Sarabjeet Singh Hira says:

    Well its a complicated thing in my point of view. when its a case of taking responsibility of our country,we do need a lot of experience, and experience comes with hardwork, and hardwork requires a lot of time. now if a person spends his whole life is building is value and gaining experience for the benefit of the country,we just cannot ask him to move out of the system.
    BUT
    There is a lot of difference between a younster and elderly peoples.youngsters are comperatively hot blooded and an excited bunch of fallow, probably have a dream to contribute more than that of elders.
    youngsters are less diplomatic and more straight forward whereas the opposite case is just vice-versa.

    Therefore,my suggestion is to have 2 seats for 1 post. An elder person to guide and express there expierenced view and a youngster to react and implement that thought.

  154. Abhimanyu Gupta says:

    yes there should be an age limit for retirement of politicians so that young generation get a chance.I think age should be 70 so that there will be a balance in the parliament.After age of 70 they should be given a position of adviser in their respective parties with certain power so that their decision is respected but they should not be given a chance to fight the election.Their ideas must be considered because they have experience and youth is there to complete their dreams in such way we can think about the progress of country in all the fields.

  155. satveer singh says:

    yes, youth is more energetic but experience also matters,
    youth is intelligent and aware about country’s problems but to solve those problems experience of seniors is necessary. after 60 they are not as much efficient to work. So they should be retire.

  156. sagar saxena says:

    You cant be so judgemental to justify the capabilities of a man on the basis of his age. Its wrong to say that old people lost their working efficiency. And its very well known that they are much more experienced and to administer a nation its a must requirement that the leaders should be experienced . Instead of age limit we should better suggest for retirements on health baasis because there are certain unhealthy youths as well as many healthy old leaders.Moreover proper selection of people on the basis of their health, knowledge etc. will surely work much better than retiring them at some age limit.

  157. ANSHUL SINHA says:

    There must be an age limit for retirement of politicians,. Its a fact that age does has a deteorating effect on the intelligence of a person. But youth must be checked while giving them such control over the country. A person who does not fit or say cannot solve the arising problems should not be allowed to come into politics ,it does not matter how young he is. Moreover, advice of an experienced person might be of some use to the young. The old politicians should be put in some advisory board that may guide the young and inexperienced according to their abilities.
    So in my opinion, yes,there should be an age -restriction, young should be allowed, but the old politicians should make an advisory board that can guide the young..

  158. MOHIT JAIN says:

    India is a nation of Youth with over 30 percent of the population residing in this bracket.
    The future of India is bestowed in the hand’s of young talent and they can majorly contribute in the development of the nation.
    There is a sudden need for upbringing youths in the political fraternity as they are the one’s full with energy and are capable of handling their responsibilities well when compared to the old,slow and sluggish politicians.They are fast,young,dynamic and have that gut and spark which can rejuvanate society and country as a whole.One more thing to point out is that there should be no partiality in choosing of the candidates because in india it is usually considered that a politician’s son will become a politician and will come to the throne.

  159. Gaurav Garg says:

    I don’t think its necessary to limit age of politicians but the criteria of his/her retirement should be depend upon the outcome of his work.if he is working with good result he/she should be on seat for no time limit where as if results of his working is not good,he should be retired from his duty….!!

  160. SAKSHI JAISWAL says:

    yes!! there should be an age limit for the politicians. those retirered politicians should give their experience to the new comers. so that they can combine their ideas with experience and take our country to a good height. it is TRUE THAT experience matters allot but it is equally true that new ideas are also important so according to me after a certain age politicians should take retierment and then guide the new ones to work in better direction.

  161. MANU SHARMA says:

    Yeah sure, we absolutely require to have some age limit for politicians. We should take the most important thing in mind when it comes to working of a person his capability to work should always be kept in check. An age limit on politicians will not only be better for the politicians it should also better for a country as a whole.
    As limiting on politicians age will give them time to take a break from the endless job they have done throughout their life, it will also give chance to young blood to prove there metal.
    Country like United States Of America too have an age limit for their President, then why should not country like India do that.
    No doubt that a person would have gained a lot of experience but it should also stands to reason that Youth is a symbol for strength and Innovation. The youngsters are asking for their stand in politics from a very large period of time and now the time has come to fulfill their wish.

  162. nupur tripathi says:

    According to me there should be age limit for politicians which should be around 60-70, it should be so late because in politics experience matter more as compared to other professions so age limit must be somewhat more as compared to other professions.Health of the politician must be a criteria in addition to age limit. New generation must be invited by the experienced ones and should be trained.the training and the new innovative thoughts of youth can lead India to new heights .
    so in my view there should be age limit and also there must be a good working environment in which youth can gain experience of experienced and use it acc to their own ideas.

  163. VISHAL SHARMA says:

    No, i am not agree with this. Anna Hajare is a old person but he able for our politician minister due to his nature of service for people.
    We may make any other law that well persons can take our responsibility just like me, and should not allow those persons who are not able for this responsibility.

  164. gaurav dusad says:

    yes we have a age limit for politician.because then our young people have a chance for politics. and our youth give a big contribution for our country.our young generation have a new tought and new ideas for our population and they can think better for us.and our politician have big age but they are still in politics.so they donot want to give chance for young.and awe not able to think new for our country.so a age limit will there and a good selection for politicians. and then we can develop our country fast with youth .

  165. Mridul Jain says:

    with the age the experiences increases ….
    that is entirely true but if we are talking about the politics there should be the age limit because the old people might not be updated with new mentality and trend then they might not make smart and good decisions . and as long as we have limiter seats in politics then the old and inefficient people are not giving the chance to the young and smart generation and that is unfortunate and
    if we have age limit in all the govt. jobs and there is retirement scheme then why not in politics……

  166. Mridul Jain says:

    with the age the experiences increases ….
    that is entirely true but if we are talking about the politics there should be the age limit because the old people might not be updated with new mentality and trend then they might not make smart and good decisions . and as long as we have limiter seats in politics then the old and inefficient people are not giving the chance to the young and smart generation and that is unfortunate and
    if we have age limit in all the govt. jobs and there is retirement scheme then why not in politics…….

  167. Arpit Khandelwal says:

    there should not be any age limit as new people with new ideas can give new dimensions to indian people and indian society.i think new people should always get chance to show their potential to lead country from the front.

  168. durgashankar saini says:

    the age limit must be in politician retirement because the human mind work at the limited age.if we don’t have age limit they brought unwanted decision.if the retirement will not done then how come the youth wiil enter the politics and that views how to come in front of our people.so the age limit become very crucial for the country growth because the old person will not work fast as the youth done.

  169. Shelly Jain says:

    “i think there should be no age limit for the politicians” Because there is no age limit for doing work and a age factor doesn’t make any effect while working if a politician who is 60yrs old, and he is physically fit it doesn’t mean that he can’t work in this age. They have gain lot of experience through their carrier and they knows very well what is right or wrong. So by their experience they are capable for taking the right decision. but after a certain age, if a politician doesn’t feels physically good or feels that he is unable to give good services to his country..or his health is supporting him than retirement must be given to that people, Because it’s a question of future of our country.So it must taken seriously.
    There is not such provision that young guys can’t get entry in politics.if they want to contribute in the development of our country through politic,then they are always free to enter in the politics and can prove themselves with their energy, new innovation and Zeal!

  170. JYOTI JAIN says:

    YES AGE LIMIT SHOULD BE THERE. IF AGE LIMIT IS NOT THERE THAN HOW NEW GENERATIONS GETS JOB AND HOW THEY GETS EXPIRIENCE IN POLITICS. IF ONLY OLD PERSONS WORKS THEN THEY DONT CHANGE THEIR RULES AND WORKING WAY SO THEIR SHOULD BE AGE LIMIT AND YONGESTERS WILL GETS CHNCE TO DO WORK AND OLD PRESONS HAVE TO TAKE THEIR RETIREMENTS AND YONGERSTOURS JOIN IT WITH NEW PASSION .. SO ITR WILL HELPFUL FOR OUR COUNTRY

  171. Hitesh Murarka says:

    According to me there should be a age limit for the politicians as we talk about the entry and retirement. You know what the youth have the better skills to grow up the country. So there should a law that youth also apply to go in the politics. Because they have better management skills, better knowledge, they have the power to take the unique decisions because their minds is working like that only.
    There should also a retirement age for the politicians because after some time the age of the politicians is like on the way that their mind is not working properly to take the better decisions which is beneficial for the country or a particular region.

  172. YOGESH AGARWAL says:

    yes its right means age limit or retirement should be in politicians. because its require for country and chances given to the new youth people. if any new youth people come to the politicians then it will be done some new work and different work so the it may be possible so the changes occur in our country.
    so age limit or retirement is necessary for any country. its good for any country.
    New generation can be changes in politics according to our choices.
    young people understand our responsibilities .

  173. VISHAL JAIN says:

    yes there should be age limit for politicians cause after 60 they can’t think in such effective way that a young man can think about any problem. We should not retire them after an age rather they should be put into opinion cell or suggestion group so that their experience can be taken in the way to get help.

  174. Bhawani Singhpanwar says:

    Yes of course we should provide an age limit for politicians because as the human mind having capacity to build or delivered the opinion for different aspects in real life scenario.Every eligible candidate should have an opportunity to get involve in its national politics.And since the young people are more acceptable towards making decisions probably much calculative and they also preserves the Knowledge about current ongoing topics . So it concludes that they can apply much more effective towards social acceptance.
    Although youngsters have lacking in experience with respect to politicians but it has to be undergo with the fact that we have all kind of generation in our living society ,so we should give more chance to young people to take part in building up our nations politics .
    Everyone being able get connect with political activities going around us and take the more socially acceptable and its directions has to be given only by experienced politicians.

  175. Narendra Chouhan says:

    i emphasize on age limitation in politics because there is a age at which a person’s capability for thinking becomes so low that counteract on him for taking right decisions.if there will be persons in politics above than 60 then he will not be able to manage the nations..age limitations will give youth a chance to be a part of nation as well energetic and innovative ideas..age limit will provide chances for youth in employement..politician above than 60 should be replaced by yonug persons.it will decrease illliteracy,corruption,crimes like rape etc.and lead the nation in a managed way.as we all know politics is crucial part of the nation so this point should taken in account in all nations definetly.

  176. Peenal Desai says:

    We should have age limit for politician so that future of India can be build on YOUNG PILLARS but the root should be old and experienced…
    so age limit should be such that experienced and naive people work together..
    “AS IT IS SAID THAT OLD IS GOLD bt TO COPE UP WITH NEW RAISED CRISIS WE NEED YOUNG PILLARS”.

  177. amit jain says:

    a good politician learn from his experience.more is experience of a politician and more is dedication towards works than more will be output .young have more energy and dedication then old . experience with young energy give better result.so political should be given chance up to they use their experience with young for country and after that they have to be retired.so there should not be any age limit only their work output decide their retirement .

  178. amit jain says:

    a good politician learn from his experience.more is experience of a politician and more is dedication towards works than more will be output .young have more energy and dedication then old . experience with young energy give better result.so political should be given chance up to they use their experience with young for country and after that they have to be retired.so there should not be any age limit only their work output decide their retirement .

  179. Akash Jain says:

    Ya of course there must be a age limit for the retirement of politicians.
    There can be various reasons , firstly the more young generation people will there ,the more will be new innovative ideas for the development of the country. Secondly according to the age many a politicians sitting on their seat just want a personal profit in the sake of the development of country.
    Also the young generation people have their own strategy with a mixing of their new and old ideas of past politicians. Also young people look towards high education which make them feel what will be the beneficial things for the country’s bright future. if the age limit will not be restricted the country’s situation will be same as it is in present. mostly politicians of our country is in the age in which they must be retired 60+ through which we can conclude what is right or what is wrong.
    So i highly opinionised there must be retired age n welcome to young politicians as they are more hardworking n efficient with the new concepts and strategies.

  180. amit jain says:

    a politician learn from his experience.more is experience of a politician and more is dedication towards works than more will be output .young have more energy and dedication then old . experience with young energy give better result.so political should be given chance up to they use their experience with young for country and after that they have to be retired.so there should not be any age limit only their work output decide their retirement.

  181. RICHA SHARMA says:

    No,not at all..Politics is noway a job like others…and politians,I feel..are provided with the most important duty that anyone can have…they are people’s representatives..people choose them out of election process. They are Dutyful and responsible people…and have 1000 more qualities as a result of which they deserve a post such as these.
    When it comes to ritirement,oh,come on..60+ – They are the people with treasure of experince..they have seen the world more than any intellect person form ‘youth’ group has possible have. They are too aware of the system and know how to deal with crisis,withoout those pressure on shoulders.They are provided with probably,the toughest job here..and still..they know how to keep up their calm.
    They,in noway need to retire. With each such leader retiring,that would mean loss of wisdom.
    And this in noway can be hold against youth of the country.C’mon,if they are worthy enough,they can find their places on their own.
    Its like,after a particular age,we’ll be able to excel our own parents..Ah -Straight NO. And the same implies here as well.
    Hope I’have cleared my pioint to everyone..!

  182. Avinash Jain says:

    In my point of view it is a social work and there is no age of doing the work for society. If someone is really dedicated to his responsibility towards society then, I wish they should never retire. its just the dediction of changing society to good way is important if any one have such qualitiess he/she should grant chance to do that for nation .
    Positive thinging,no selfish motives,dedictions towards the nation responsibilities are main qualities and politican should have. On behalf of this only selction should be done ..

  183. maharshi vyas says:

    Yes there should be age limit to our politicians for retirement. As we are in developing country,so we need those persons as leaders who is capable to understand the new generations and is fast. As if youth will be as leader,then there will be safe responsibility on them and they can move towards new ideas. They themselves can work very fast and effectively. In this modern technology, we need a new ideas having leader, who can effectively give rise in every technical as well as every field. So GUUUYYYYSssssssssss really think upon it,if we want to develop,,then move ahead youth for the leadership and must limit the age or retirement age.

  184. Anita Bhawaria says:

    There should be age limit in an retirement , because of the after the 60 year most of them not properly take good decisions, so by retiring these there should give chance for young leaders. thinking of old age leaders is according to their generation but this time is of modern technology so it is required to make decisions by keeping in mind about present time requirements.

  185. DEVENDRA KUMAR GOYAL says:

    From my point of view there is become certain age limit. Because we know after some age our body can not do work as youth candidate .So when age limit then youth have opportunity to do good work for our country with new ideas .And youth can take right decisions. Here i also want to say there is become also exam process thus in politics educated persons arrives so they can take right decisions and can do work with more efficient.

  186. BHAVNA SHARMA says:

    Let me know just one thing- If we have age limits for all the government jobs, then why cant we have age limits for politicians? As if all other fields are free from politics? or is it like that people learn politics till the retirement age in india and then play!? “Rediculus”!! If still we dont understand why our country is still Backward then we are fool! Indian politics seems to be “Old Age Home”! Where people whose energy and enthusiasm is burned in struggle of life, are welcomed. If we find the need for innovation in Our politics then we should not forget-“Innovations come with beginners”. Even kids dont like old teachers in their classes. So my suggestion is all the grandpas n grandmas should be given rest!! And let youth come forward and set the competition at its peak. Then only the Country will grow!!

  187. Akanksha Kalla says:

    Obviously there should be an age limit in politics. New ideas are needed to run our country. And also in every field, everyone gets retired after certain age limit, then why not these politicians get retired. Rules are same for every citizen of India. So, this rule must also be imposed on these politicians.

  188. Himanshu Verma says:

    i think there is need of age limit for the politicians because politicians are the leaders our our country , they represent our country towards whole the world.so they want to be educated and understanding people who think about the people of the country and of the government.Age limit also necessary for the retierment of of the politicians because young people represent the things by new mind and technology.mentality difference is also in young people and old people.

  189. SHASHANK MISHRA says:

    the age limitation for the polition is restricted because throgh the age limit the peson can change and through the new young person have some new idia about our country the new polition can tke decision in the faver of the country so the age limitation is must compulsary for the polition

  190. Pravin Singh Shekhawat says:

    According to my views there should not be an age limit for reservation becuse through this people have no much time for proove them in limited period.
    -ive points-
    through this only those person can make their which have politician background.
    no one can people prepare for that.

  191. indu chhipa says:

    Age limit for retirement should be necessary because every new thing is generated by coming generation and they have” new ideas to perform them” but as age increases our capability of thinking and developing should be minimized so it is required.they can not handle it…

  192. sahil arora says:

    Yes, The age limit matters. It should be 60 years. But the experienced or the talented people are really important in our goverment so these experinced people should be assigned as consultants or they should be pair with new unexperienced people.

  193. Shaheen Khan says:

    yes I am supporting this statement. There should be a age limit for retirement in politics. There are so many reasons behind this. one of the main reason is that we should give more chance to the youth. And this is my personal view that Indian youth have a talent that they can give eventually progress to our country. They are too much energetic and have so many new ideas for implementation that give a right direction to our country. And old politicians are completely bored from our profession and they have to switch in another field where they are suitable

  194. Rahul Saini says:

    yes there are age limit of politician and it is very necessery to appotunuty to young generation and young generation can proved themsalves,they have many innovatives idea and skills to handled any type of problem and they are have to apportunhity to young generation in politics.

  195. Abhilash Kaushik says:

    As in my view yes there should be an age limit because as the age of the person grow above yes the experience increase but the power of decision making & other aspect doesn’t support by their health.In india usually we have a prime minister above 70 which reflect back in there decision & way of work whereas in other countries the progress is shown with the young leader’s

  196. ritambhara pandey says:

    YES….age limit is really important in politics because by this many problems can b solved like unemployment,corruption,poverty …and this is also very important because new generation is very innovative and many politicians are very irresponsible towards country

  197. Shishupal Nagar says:

    there should be a retirement age . politician should be youth and young man give his/her work .and have a time to develope .

  198. divya vohra says:

    In my point of view, a politician is a social worker, and there is no limit for social work, so there should not be a age limit or retirement for politicians.’BUT’ it should also be kept in mind that duties and responsibilities of a politicians are also huge.So, instead of any age limit other factors “hard work and honesty, should be taken into account for politicians.

  199. vishnu jangid says:

    age limit are new ideas from new generation …and according to me age limit is compalsory and education is also compalsory for new politicions we need change our politicis system

  200. Satyavan Fauzdar says:

    yes you are right that there is no age limit for doing anything but in politics must be apply age limit b’coz
    a young man know very much about the new environment rather than an old person.

  201. Mayank Sharma says:

    I dont think there should be any age limit for poloticians because as you grow your xperience grows,it is the old saying that before performing anything take advices from elders,this is the basic reason they say this. they must have gone through many situations they must have faced many circumstances…hence their views are utmost important.
    Because ernstwhile we have lost many successors like DR AbdulKalam just because of the time was alloted to him for which he has to be serve for the country.
    Instead of any age limit they should be given the power to take retirement according to their choice,and accordind to the public reviews….
    The public reviews must be given the primary preference.

  202. Sachin Sharma says:

    there should not be age limit for polititians…they are elder and they have more experience and knowledge….they know better than than youngers that how to handle difficult condition…so i endore the point there shouldn’t be age limit…

  203. Sachin Sharma says:

    who are Entrepreneurs?they are those who start their own business…they are self dependent…they take risk…while managers are those who manages their boss’s work…Entrepreneurs only think for themselve…they think how to boom their business.how to provide jobs for mass…Entrepreneurs can be a single person oe a group..they think only for themselve because they have to manage their own…they dont think about salary ,they think about money…how can they enhance their business. they are owner of their own.their mind is set for only success…that’s why they are more successfull than managers…

  204. Kamal Kaswan says:

    I think age should not a full considering factor for retirement as experienced persons are mostly aged so we have to provide analyser or advisor like post for such experienced persons rather than putting them in feild work. Although age limits working capacity and lack of new emerging ideas.

  205. navin kumar says:

    according to my point there is no age limit for the social works but after 60 to 70 ages of the leaders give chance to the youth.because our youth get more energy to complte the task to growth our country.so inter relations between the youth and ages leader

  206. komal sharma says:

    yes,there should be age limit in politics.because politicians are very important part of every country.and after crossing a age limit,there also becomes many problems related to health and all other things,they also not be able for complete their responsibilities…and they are not also think much more according to their age..they only thing in fixed small criteria and for country development it is necessary to think in much and broad mind..and after retirement of theirs,youngsters can also get opportunities for enter in this field and they can develop country by giving their new initiative ideas for a country.

  207. Ajay kumar sharma says:

    yes it shoud be that age limit in politicion.beacuse in old age think capacity is not good. and in this age we need to rest .if i am politicon in old age we shoud speak some speech.and more travling so such think are not good. and if young man coming in politicon than idea also come beause new thinks come .and he known about all new thinks and old expricence get to our elder.and young man having more energy than old man.

  208. manish jangir says:

    Yes, age limit is required in every field according to your post. Without age limit we can’t give the responsbilities to the youth of nation….
    If we see in every work or job after a certain limit every company/goverment give there employs retirement because they are not working efficiently and they spent his/her life with many disease….
    the dedication for his/her job get down after a certain limit.. they are not able to think efficiently..
    “These all problems are also occur with politicians”. After a certain time period they are not able to work hardly for the nation and because of relaxation they are corrupted… So the age limit is also required in politics…..

  209. Manju Gajraj says:

    age limit are not compulsary for the politics some times the age are better for the politicans …………i think new genertion have a new idea and impliment his life then its better for nation ………..some times are wrong but not for all time when the new genertion inpire his parents they easily know what is better and what is wrong there parents also understand about our responibilty and any decisionshare for future of the childerns …………..
    after the age of 50 60 the man cannot work as youth and its lazy her work and make a wrong decion for our benifts they dont share the new technology because they donot know about the new rules make for public

  210. Umang Pareek says:

    there should be a age limit for politician . in india there is no age limit , in this field that is a big loss for india because of that reason young genration not get there job opportunity in this field . youngester have new idea , new thoughts which gave height to that feild .if there is a age limit in that field having good job opportunity. with the help of new thoghts and idea of young genration a nation have also need some experience….so some time its good bt not for all time ….
    so we should have Age Limit or Retirement for Politicians .

  211. Lokesh Panwar says:

    Yes, thesre is vary haribally need for Retirement age for politision. becoze tha need for that to make india to new india. Tha age ration of Retirement will be 55-60 yr. so if they will retire thare will new person or Young person will take palace of his/her post, if there will young people These thinking like a YOUNG that is responsibal for tha New Grothing People or COUNTRY,. there we can se there old age people wo are tha Do work vary honestly in tha young time and as thay are old they think taht thay are evert thing and they will COURPT… That are responsibal for curraption.. and these people not do any work if at tha place of these old politation tha YOUNG people will do work and he will nit may be courrapt. So to See tha Responsibality and Corrpatuion tha Age Of Retirement will Deside. Now If we see that there is any Old Polition THese thinking Will Be old and After tha age of 60 cross tha mind will be work slow in many cases tha scientest hane prove that. So tha age will be deside and that Will be “55-60″/..
    youth politicians are also crushed by some politicians.
    corruption in India also are in its full speed so there is need to change the entire structure of politics. Educated people understand more about the development and ways to develop our country so i think retirement of politicians should be a part of our system.

  212. punit arora says:

    foresure, there is certain age limit for politicians because if we want a retirement age for them it means we want youngster in this field and we all know that youngster have great enthusisam and ability to something new There must be some sort of such things so that we can restrict the future of the country in the new hands that have emerged out with new ideas and talent.so my thinking is that there should be something that youngsters like us will get some chance to get into politics and with their curiosity and dynamic thoughts they can put INDIA forward .today as we can seen the corruption full enviornment in indian poltics so young generation can control quite better than the the older …..sO there should be certainly age limit upto 60,which can provide better hand to indian demostration!!!!!

  213. Prateek Agarwal says:

    according to me,age limit is a very important par for all the politician who handle our entire nation.i agree for your statement that most of the politician should cross the age limit.and the age limit is about 55-60 is not so far to take decisions or growth our country.there should be a less opportunity for a younger who didn’t take part in this field.for a dynamic decisions,we should have a smart minded person who can take decisions very early and have a power to handle other things also. a age limit for politicians played a crucial role to role-up their thoughts to take decisions smartly.so age limit must be there for our corrupted nation,that a retirement should be given for those who cross there age limit.
    young person which is full of energy,strong and fresh minded who can handle the entire nation,who can take smart decisions for remove corruption and other facing problems to growth or increase the level of our country.so reqired young leaders who can lead our nation.

  214. Arun Prajapati says:

    Yes ‘I totally agree that, a politician has to have a retirement age, because politicians are very crucial and imperative towards the country. Generally after the age of 50 a person becomes lazy, inculcates many health problems and as they loose there capability to think more effectively and work more positively. And I thing that it is good to give youths more opportunities than giving an aged person because youths are full of ideas and are energetic in their task.

    So politicians should have retirement age of nearly 60 -65yrs of age!

  215. Pratyush Mahlawat says:

    yeah i am agree to this point because requirement of age limit is necessary….due to age limit opportunities will go on younster’s hand….youngster’s have new ideas,new thoughts etc as well as modern thinking because at some level youngster’s provide some modern ideas in this field….main point is if youngster’s have right to vote then y they don’t have right to join politics….
    ths is because of no age limit criteria…..age limit for politicians is necessary…..!!!
    thanku n this is very impressive post for discussion….

  216. sonali sharma says:

    Age limit for politicians is now a demand of our nation. Some politicians rule country not only for decades or their life time but for generations. There is no retirement in politics so rich politicians pass on their empire to their non deserving children. if there will be retirement then there will be race among new generation to take a part in it, to be part of our government. Youngster can give their new ideas to the experienced one and if they get appreciation our government will be a blend of new innovative ideas and experience both.

  217. Hemant Aseri says:

    There should be a age limit for politician. In india there are no age limit in this field that is a big loss for india because of that reason young generation not get there job opportunity in this field.Youngster’s have new idea’s,new thought which gave a new height of that field in india and if age limit in this field then it gave the job opportunity to people and change are necessary for success in every field…..

  218. Surja Ram Bhagat says:

    Ya, according to different point of views we can take this topic.
    I think age limit is not the point which make our politicians strong. If they are able to listen what people are saying then there is no problem what the age of that politician.
    According to me age should be allowed but people should be aware. They should not support a illegal i.e. a criminal person. They should not support genericity i.e. in past father was M.L.A. or M.P. and now his son is same.

  219. Shashank Khatri says:

    No,according to me the age limit should not be the primary thing but the thing is that i thought that “is the politicians are right to handle the government or not,or the politician that the people select is right regarding the human welfare.”Age limit doen’t matter if there is a law is coming in the market that,”those who done well,who remain”,if this law may be granted then it will surely effect on the country’s behaviour.
    The politicians may be appointed for the country welfare so age limit make a right choice but appointing a correct person is the essential requirement.

  220. Vikas Lalwani says:

    Yes,i totally agree with the above age limit idea.We sholud give opportunity to young people as they are enthusiastic and energetic with new ideas and most propbably they are innovative too. Old people are not good enough,as if they would have been then our country would have been changed from developing country to developed country,we lack in many fields from other countries. Old politicians are tired of doing the same thing again and again but still they will not leave politics as the power of leader and corruption money stop them from doing so. So,we shold have age limit for politicians to give chances to our new generation and to develop our country from their ideas.

  221. Vibhav Somani says:

    There should be an age limit for the politicians. The age limit should be of 60-65 years. Thats the truth that in every field country wants young generation and young generation is doing well for country. This is also true that after 60 years people become lazy and have health related issues. At that time they are not able to run country. So there is a need of age limit.

  222. Vaibhav Rawat says:

    yes i think there is an age limit of retirement in our politics..because by doing that we can change the complete environment of the society and the country by introducing new and fresh minds by replacing the old ones who doesn’t able to change any sort of problems because due to the lack of there will power to do something for the change and have a lot of laziness amongst them..so having an age limit in politics in a necessary thing if we have to make some new and drastic changes in this society and hence can improve our entire system..

    • Shailender Singh says:

      No there is no need of any age limit on the retirement for politicians,
      because if u think that the young generation can only change the country… then it is in your hand that who will be the leader of the nation of state
      there should be some aged peoples who have a straight forward n effective thinking of politics so they can handle the nation better then the young people who have less leadership
      so the age limits cant do anything, all is in our hand that whom we choose for the leadership.

  223. Nitin K Pareta says:

    ACCORDING TO MY POINT OF VIEW AGE IS NOT RELATED WITH RETIREMENT BECAUSE A PERSON OF AGE 65 DOING GOOD WITH COMPARE TO A PERSON OF AGE 25 THEN WHO HAS TO BE NEED TO RETIRE ?
    THIS IS OTHER THING THAT AFTER A PARTICULAR AGE A PERSON BECOME SLOW BUT IF HE IS SHOWING ITS POTENTIAL THEN HE HAS THE IDEA ,WHEN HE HAS TO RETIRE

  224. Saurabh Jajoo says:

    age doesn’t metters for any one. according to me the politicians are the main parts of our country. if any age
    limit is there then how there experience will be useful for us. if we will take the example of mr atal bihari vajpayi and mr narendra modi they gave and giving there best in the age of 70s. so there retierment should be based on there workability not on there age. and if we want young generation to work in politics then the aged politicians should be there to direct them.

  225. palash kothari says:

    yes i am completly agree with the age limit for the retirement of the politicians.we want some younger mind or new generation in our parliament.not the old ones they dont know how to keep process in the parliament.and old politicians should take rest.because these days are for their rest not for to take decisions that what is right for the country and what is wrong.and some old politicians are good i know,but i dont know what is the use of uneducated peoples in our parliament.and we all know the big names of some uneducated politicians.so definetly there should have age limit for the politicians.

  226. vikash ahirwar says:

    age limits are for new ideas from new generation …our nation have also need some experience….so some time its good bt not for all time

  227. viyet roy says:

    young generation is most important for politics,because if this happen than only the young member are able to take responsibility of the country in their hands. 🙂

  228. Vipin Sahu says:

    In every field we had an retirement ,a politician has to have a
    retirement age,because politicians are very crucial and imperative towards country.Generally after the age of 60-65 a person becomes lazy and suffer from health problems and as they loose there capability to think more effectively and work positively.And i think a young politician would always be active and are full of new innovative ideas.

  229. Pratima Gupta says:

    we should have retirement for politicians also because every thing in this world has expiry date so why not politicians. if aged people are not retired then how can youth involve in politics. In India most of the people have mentality to crush another one and go ahead so youth politicians are also crushed by some politicians.
    corruption in India also are in its full speed so there is need to change the entire structure of politics. Educated people understand more about the development and ways to develop our country so i think retirement of politicians should be a part of our system.

  230. Er Ketan Joshi says:

    Yes,there should be a certain age slap for retirement our politicians.
    Because due to age factor the work efficiency is decreases which is proven by scientifically studies.
    Yes, we have some exceptional cases, but we not consider this on masses. So,we should have our political system similar like corporate world Because although politician also a civil servant.

  231. Surendra Kumar says:

    There are in every field a specific age limit is declared ,but in politics more than 80 percent politicians are above 60 age. there should be a age limit of politicians because of the after the 60 year most of them not properly take good decisions, so by retiring these there should give chance for young leaders. thinking of old age leaders is according to their generation but this time is of modern technology so it is required to make decisions by keeping in mind about present time requirements.not all old age politicians are not capable to make good decisions but most of them are. At this time if any one got a chance then it want to always in politics they not want to give chance to any more,this is not right .there is required to come young leaders for lead our nation.

  232. Jeetendra Thakur says:

    I PERSONALLY BELIEVE THAT THERE SHOULD BE A AGE LIMIT ABOUT 50-60 YEARS FOR THE RETIREMENT IN POLITICS.BECAUSE IN EVERY JOB THERE IS A PROVISION OF RETIREMENT WHEN THAT PARTICULAR ORGANISATION FEEL THAT THIS PERSON IS NO MORE SUITABLE FOR THAT JOB DUE TO PROBLEMS RELATED TO HIS/HER AGE.SO WHY NOT SO IN POLITICS ……POLTICIANS ALSO DO JOB AS A REPRESENTATIVES OF PEOPLE IN GOVERMENT…..SO THERE SHOULD BE APROVISION OF THEIR RETIREMENT AFTER A CERTAIN PARTICULAR AGE……..BECAUSE AT THE AGE ABOVE 50 PEOPLE DON’T POSSES MUCH ACTIVESS,AND THINKING ABILTY TOWARDS THEIR WORK…….SO AT THIS AGE THEY SHOULD BE RETIRE……BECAUSE POLITICIANS DO THE MOST RESPONSIBLE JOB THAT ALL THE FUTURE ASPECTS OF OUR COUTRY DEPEND ON THEIR WAY OF WORKING…….SO YOUNGSTERS SHOULD BE GET A CHANCE BECAUSE YOUTH HAVE NEW INNOVATIVE IDEAS,STRONG WILL POWER,ACTIVENESS TOWARDS THEIR WORK ……SO THEY ARE THE RIGHT CANDIDATE FOR THE POTICIAN JOB………..THERE ARE CURRENTLY SO MANY POLITICIANS IN OUR COUNTRY WHO HAS CROSSED THE AGE OF 60 AND THEY ARE STILL IN GOVERMENT………SO THERE SHOULD BE A PROVISION OF RETIREMENT OR MAY BE AGE LIMIT FOR POTICS…….

  233. Arun Kumar says:

    NO. ACCORDING TO MY POINT OF VIEW, THERE SHOULD NOT BE AGE LIMIT IN POLITICS, BECAUSE WHEN AGE IS INCREASE THEN THE EXPERIENCE AND DESISIONS CAPABILITY IS ALSO INCREASE.
    AND THEY DESIDE THAT WHAT PROJECT IS SUITABLE FOR OUR COUNTRY OR SOCEITY . SO THERE SHOULD NOT AGE LIMITS IN POLITICS. LOWER AGE SHOULD BE LIMITED.

  234. Aditya Kushwah says:

    As far as i am concern each and everyone has limited working efficiency.the government has decided age limit of retirement at 60 because after that time people are not to able to do work as efficiently as before. One thing that i would like to let you all know that is the prime minister of India is working at above 80 and how could he manage himself to conduct all the essential operations of the country.Most of the politicians are sleeping during the session of the parliament while rest of them are blaming on each other for the losses and scams. I firmly believe that age limitations should also be apply on these politicians who are letting our country in backward directions apart from competiting with the United States. These politicians are provided with the laptops and tablets but they dont even know how to operate that technical equipments whereas well educated youngsters are unemployed who have capabililities to lead our country.

  235. Swapnil Mishra says:

    yes I think we should have age limit for politicians because if we have age limit for gov. employees who create the idea of policies for the gov. then why should not we have retirement for the politicians.
    according to me we should have education criteria too for the politicians if they are uneducated then how would they lead the educated people.
    In India youth called “Icon of India” and they are also called power of the nation, so i think if educated youth join our country’s politics then they definitely can give us good and new thoughts for grooming india and this is also a rise of new politics in India and perhaps then movement like Anna Hazare’s movement wont be required.
    For retired politicians there should be a Advisory committee in india in which we can get the benefit of their experience.

  236. Nitin Dwivedi says:

    i am not with any kind of age limit for our politicians because if we want a retirement age for them it means we want youngster in this field and we all know that youngster have the power off will but not any kind of experience and for the politics the experience is more important than power.
    But for some sector of politics like business,sports and some other field we can make a solution with to have some youth mandatory. Thank you

  237. Prayas Vyas says:

    According to me there should be age limit for retirement of politician because i personally think due to no age limit their would be less opportunities for young generation & due to this they cannot have even a chance to do something good for welfare of our country.
    They cannot proof themselves to be an asset for our country to do some variations in our constitution , to be very frank i think old aged politicians cannot think as young aspiring mind can think, so their should be age limit for politicians.
    And i think if our youth can perform in rest of the fields like engg. ,medical, and other field then why youngster cannot choose politics as a career option. They also can make politics as a good career choice.

  238. Ankit Pahariya says:

    Hello everyone…i think there should be no age limit for the politicians..because i strongly believe that there is no age limit for doing work….and a age factor doesn’t make any effect while working if a politician who is 60yrs old, and he is physicaly fit…it doesn’t mean that he can’t work in this age…always think that they have been gain alot of experiance’s throughout their carrier and they knows very well what is right or wrong… so their experience’s will always provide them for taking the right decision…apart from that there must be provision of retirement…after a certain age, if a politician doesn’t feels physically good or feels that he is unable to give good services to his country..or his health is supporting him than he/she must take the retirement..beacause it’s a qusetion of future of our country….so it must taken seriously…..
    As I see above comments…many of guys are saying that young generation should get the chance to prove themselves in politics…i would like to tell them that…there is not such provison that young guys can’t get entry in politics…if they want to contribute in the development of our country through politics…then they are always free to enter in the politics and can prove themselves…!

  239. Sonali Jain says:

    I do not believe in specific retirement age for our politician.the decision should be voluntary one .The guideline regarding retirement can be set down by each politician party.
    Politician would need to retire not only because physically dis unable to cope with the rigours for this
    demanding carrier , but because they feel that they have done their bit for the country.
    Corruption, criminialisation and the perception average indian politician is a gray ,unresponsive,time less entity — an entity that will be not let go off its position of power.
    Lets be honest an energetic active,inspirational,75 year old politician is more the expection then the rule

  240. Singh Vishu says:

    it must be a rule that there should be age lime in the politicians it is because every body knows that as the time passes new techonlogy alwayse in the faceof the field and a new generation is always more prefer than the old generation so there should be a synchronization between the politecian and the technology which we are awareing today

  241. ajanta priyadarshini sahani says:

    As we know politicians are very crucial and important part of our country

  242. asish kumar panda says:

    politicians must have the age limits because when they are in age 50 and 60 they are very lazy.they are not interested in their politics due thair lazyness and old age.so i am interested on youngpeople because they are good on labour and hard work.they have the ability to do every work in our country sucessfully.so in my language young generation is most important for politics.

  243. Niroj Pahi says:

    THERE SHOULD NOT BE THE AGE LIMITATION IN INDIAN POLITICS. THE YOUNGSTERS HAVE THE POWER TO RUN IN POLITICS AND THE SENIOR CITIGENS HAVE THE MIND POWER TO RUN IT.

  244. RAJIB LOCHAN PANIGRAHI says:

    IN MY POINT OF VIEW THERE SHOULD BE AN AGE LIMIT IN EVERY FIELD. WHO HAVE RETIRE THEY ARE 55-60 AGE . SO THEY ARE LAZY IN WORK. ONLY YOUNG MEMBER ARE TAKE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTRYTHEIR HANDS.IN MY POINT YOUTH ARE FULL OF PASSION AND THEY HAVE CAPABILITY TO WORK WITH ZEAL & CONFIDENCE. YOUTH ARE FRESH MIND AND CAN TAKE RIGHT DECISSION.SO AGE LIMIT IS REQIRE FOR POLITICIANS.

  245. Saroj Pahi says:

    in my point view, there should be no age limit for politics… there is no age limits for social work… Bcz, a good leader is not known by his/her age, he/she is well known by his/her leadership quality, managerial skills, risk taking quality, problem solving capacity, etc. So, A person whether he/she is a young guy or old man, having the above quality is be a good politician…

  246. sagar tripathy says:

    ACCORDING TO MY POINT OF VIEW THERE SHULD NOT BE AN AGE LIMIT FOR POLITICIANS THATS ALL DEPAND UPON THEIR PERSONALE.AND IN INDIA MORE THAN 80% OF THE POLITICIANS ARE WITHIN 55 TO 60.IN THIS POLITICS AREA THE MORE WE CAN UTILIZE OUR BRAIN THE MORE YOU EXPERIENCE. SO ALL D POLITICIANS HAVE THEIR OWN RIGHTS TO CHOODE THEIR RETIREMENT PERIOD…………………………..

    THANK YOU

    • Saroj Pahi says:

      YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT @SAGAR.. I COMPLETELY APPRICIATE YOUR POINT OF VIEW….

    • Shilpa Ranjan says:

      Your point is also right sagar but if so then young people will never get chance to join politics and work for our country.The same trend will be continued for ever.so their must be something so that the young people who are moving to other nation for the seek of job and to pursue higher degree can join politics. our country needs more and more talent so that the country will rise !!!!!!

      • Shikha Pandey says:

        HERE IS THE QUESTION OF OUR COUNTRY & I THINK ONLY EXPERIENCED PERSON CAN THINK BETTER BECOZ THEIR VIEWS DEPEND ON THE PRESENT AS WELL FUTURE OF OUR COUNTRY.IT’S NOT JUST DECIDING ABOUT THE SMALL THING ,HERE THE EACH AND EVERY DECISION DECIDE THE SUVIVAL OF OUR CITIZEN . SO A PERSON ,WHO IS ABLE TO UNDER EVERY ASPECT CAN ONLY GET A CHANCE TO BE A POLITICIAN & I THINK A LONG TIME EXPERIENCED PERSON CAN BE A BETTER OPTION.

  247. Arpita Sardar says:

    ofcourse there should be an age limit for politician bcoz if it is not then young generation will nvr get a chnc to represent their views their openions as a politician…

    • ashok singh says:

      well said arpita there should be age limit for politicians that require to given a chance to the young politician
      to change the country befits to change the youth mind about corruption of the leaders in Indian economic standards.

  248. Arpita Sardar says:

    ofcourse there should be an age limit for politician bcoz if it is not then young gneretaion will nvr get a chnc to represent their views their openions as a politician…

  249. rajeev ranjan says:

    politics is something different from other environment. As we have a decision taking member in our family who is elder n quite experienced likewise that politics too requires an experience to greater extent. The young generation of today like us lacks patience and tolerance power. An important skill what is called as power to see d future after a decision is taken is required because its for our nation , for our uncountable people . so age limit is required but at the same time young genertaion should only participate if they have experience .

  250. sakshi chaudhary says:

    of course their should be the age limit,,,,because if this happen than only the young member are able to take responsibility of the country in their hands////

  251. arun kumar says:

    According to me the age limit must be there, A politician cant work till his/her death. Politician must have the age limit above 40 and below 65.Science had proved that after some age limit the human thinking gets low he/she cant have the same memory power as had earlier and also proved that the people have a best working and sharp mind in its age limit and it also does not depend on the work experience. Suppose a man/women have a 40 year work experience in his/her field then also after 40 year he/she cant able to give the same performance as he/she given in his/her woking career.Same condition is applied to the politician.

    • SHILPA RANJAN says:

      why you are limiting age of politicians from 40 to 65 ?? Don’t you think young people like us who are willing to join and do political work should join & do something for our mother land ???

  252. Bharti Pandey says:

    I truly agree with the fact it is necessary to have age of retirement …..But if a person is dedicated towards the country and aims towards the Benefit of COUNTRY then it is not necessary to have it….

  253. roshani mishra says:

    Youth are full of passion and they have capability to work with zeal and confidence. They are fresh minded and can take right decision.

    • Shilpa Ranjan says:

      very true !!! the young people have to move forward and join politics for the development of our country !!

  254. patlakshi says:

    Yes, i do think that there should be an age limit to the politicians so that the new comers could join hands more and their new ideas and creative thinking may lead India, our nation to that top which it deserves.

  255. astha vaish says:

    yes, ofcourse…age limit should be there bacause now a dayz youngsters are full of creativity,talent ,new ideas,nd full of energy ,zeal so dey hav got the will to bring d sudden changes if required for the nation compared to those who hav grew old…..

  256. huma fatima says:

    Yes it has become the need of an hour.And this will also encourage the young blood to come forward.The new India needs people who should work for for them with new zeal and energy……….and new comers have an incredible zeal to work irresistently…….

    • SHILPA RANJAN says:

      yeah very true and this will lead our country to high position and it will become more developed !!!

  257. Ankita Sharma says:

    In my point of view it is a social work and there is no age of doing the work for society. If someone is really dedicated to his responsibility towards society then, I wish they should never retire. But in present scenario Figure is totally changed. EXCEPT FEW EVERYONE must retire from Indian politics. Because they are serving their own society called FAMILY.

    • SHILPA RANJAN says:

      Yeah exactly you are right that there is no age for social work & to serve your nation but if you will see the current scenario of the political system it is corrupt in that extent that even if we will try to make our country corruption free it will be hard to achieve… so my view is that there should be something that youngsters like us will get some chance to get into politics and with their curiosity and dynamic thoughts they can put INDIA forward !!!!

  258. Mankeshwar Tripathi says:

    Yes, exactly. There must be some sort of such things so that we can restrict the future of the country in the new hands that have emerged out with new ideas and talent.

    • BHAVYA NARULA says:

      Favor of setting a retirement age for a politician.
      I’d like to start with an Example, there is a huge difference in our ideology and that of our grandparents. In some cases they are right but in most cases they do not understand the current scenario of this modern day society. Same applies when handling the today’s political system.
      They would go for the conventional ways for solving any issue, but lack the risk taking abilities that the current generation have.
      Of course, like everything needs to be refreshed from time to time, and add new ideas to it, so does our political system. So, the leaders who have crossed a certain age limit should now make way for the new generation lads to get in..
      With the experience of the elder ones and the refreshing and scenario-adaptive ideas of the young generation, our country will rise to glory….

      • Shivani Gupta says:

        According to me age limit should not be there in politics.As we have seen our past politicians like JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU,INDIRA GANDHI,B.R AMBEDKAR
        They are fresh minded and can take right decision. The decision taken by young person is dynamic. Ifthere willbe age limit then young generation will get chance to prove themselves. Now a day’s more than 90 % of Indian politicians are above 60. Just because there is no age limit, a politician continues to do his job until he is alive. I know they have experience but after a certain age limit they are not able to work so effectively which automatically lowers the development of our country. Due to lack of job opportunities many youngsters are going to foreign countries for higher education or in seek of good job. Youth should be given opportunity in politics. If there will be age limit of 60 years for politicians and they won’t be allowed to work beyond this age many of the young people will get chance to work and do some good steps to improve our nation . So that there may be chance of change in corrupted politics and make our country corruption free and developed. Politicians would need to retire notonly because they are physically unable to cope with the rigors of this demanding career, but because they feel that they have done a bit for the country. So I suggest that the age limit should be restricted up to age of 60.

« »